Re: [nfsv4] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types-10: (with COMMENT)
Tom Haynes <loghyr@gmail.com> Thu, 19 April 2018 15:29 UTC
Return-Path: <loghyr@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EF712DA40; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hx6m_H7-ODAG; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x242.google.com (mail-pf0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69E4312DA2C; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id y69so2805920pfb.5; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=9hcnSsORqHPV0Q6BoTd1/x1dt6LLq+SU3afSQc0Q46c=; b=ql9LKyw6JHHOZ4z50ODJ6q8S1L1ED+z27YTeVVmRZfYJhaeIY08ylUaO86lWgkIH9K YYnmn7NGzyL8qorO8RXfpwAzMvxB4YTHJc9Koe8XhO05ewKAKUwl8marU9iwOLaJuIFm +wMyPirl7bwscvy4CuaVn5emyKqpUAIUNPqpsG/5/9tJOxVnjCE4b9uGC8az09/33HoB 5FuRgq+Ax8VN37uH3Pse4BlPvNa+KYyBtt+mqP7hyfBiMF4qlhezRPqBU3hHsH4pl0GY TFoPY4NXOPn8XfUZMmLtXqKeoovQ4bZIwvW6NhAar1b3RJQ2EzXTsYI0kI95IbFvkmHq O/pA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=9hcnSsORqHPV0Q6BoTd1/x1dt6LLq+SU3afSQc0Q46c=; b=gLnRW+NIFgHFt+j8yNUy8/N6KfggdUWsSKyPtH2f2jcN+c7NK6dLwcZd9YBbAnVVjY Hjy09FOkaLaFLzSvZ5XjsNqCyKMH8zds7u+QvXxFTpgTxK2tG8ARUMEo2bLus5KSpgQg VSmzXe7Dkfto7rZjhLwQsr7hIlbhDR/mMqrJmWXXtvStKBQYAwCBcmwN+HS2uq8pBwWP teMTP2uYIHJll4j7azkBHw2ngDk2ciTn+GeKqPGvQPnHN07hAvJRpPkaCOGpkEbwJrHG ovq7yd41ld1ZD7pdGtDBDwNb4EfG529cAotXZW6rcsYbUD54fYhWM5MXUv9WKpIwRgwD Z1nw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDMH7Cp41OL836NpyzXJrjXaUzoy3ma0q5P9NndFo6L2NZzvETM hNHXtpW8kPEsvf+JK5ou42A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48DmcvZ0viiC3WNzjPtzPfrtrWcWKVOBga/mj2amqC61SBTO1NJt/u3jvFYJOfeV+WOAl36Dg==
X-Received: by 10.101.96.10 with SMTP id m10mr5512735pgu.281.1524151783077; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kinslayer.corp.primarydata.com (63-157-6-18.dia.static.qwest.net. [63.157.6.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z23sm2693343pfe.110.2018.04.19.08.29.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
From: Tom Haynes <loghyr@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <152410053639.28741.11668651119350111537.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:29:41 -0700
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types@ietf.org, nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org, Spencer Shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>, nfsv4@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <802D7E15-E5B0-4B8C-B293-4B6CDC68EBB1@gmail.com>
References: <152410053639.28741.11668651119350111537.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/VoGH4m5DEFNYYinOxWcmSZKAoxo>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 15:29:45 -0000
> On Apr 18, 2018, at 6:15 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote: > > Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types-10: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks to all involved for the work they did on this document. > > I had the same confusion as Benjamin, and support his discuss. I also found one > very small grammar nit in §2: > >> (file) data: is that part of the file system object which contains >> the data to read or written. > > Change to either "...to read or write." or "...to be read or written." > > Thanks Adam, I went with "...to be read or written."