IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-07.txt

"Black, David" <david.black@emc.com> Wed, 17 August 2016 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2427812DA66 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=emc.com header.b=nvV1HRMh; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=emc.com header.b=AD4GKANK
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KE2E_gjWjihy for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esa8.dell-outbound.iphmx.com (esa8.dell-outbound.iphmx.com [68.232.149.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 898F012DAF8 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=emc.com; i=@emc.com; q=dns/txt; s=jan2013; t=1471452211; x=1502988211; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=WHu0AG0Bb3WDuqgs44wmL5r7pItdzxTj0xhjX0vy3c0=; b=nvV1HRMhCuBa15suB1jLtWwZrfJCY3hHpr3kg81LNOxrH8cbVV5VxzEd RlJfkoypNnlufqJAz1OhbEdNaDTL/SzwfaxPWKVO8lCMAIRNLeA+VjTui Ca0eKJNJTcyxYKj9DJJw1XOjk3nilAs1TDzW98IyBNkXio2nzVax7kCSj c=;
Received: from esa4.dell-outbound2.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.98]) by esa8.dell-outbound.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Aug 2016 11:43:30 -0500
Received: from mailuogwdur.emc.com ([128.221.224.79]) by esa4.dell-outbound2.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Aug 2016 22:43:30 +0600
Received: from maildlpprd55.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd55.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.159]) by mailuogwprd53.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id u7HGhRlM007126 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:43:28 -0400
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd53.lss.emc.com u7HGhRlM007126
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1471452208; bh=iW+lk/G2eWYD/C+n1Kju4lqzado=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=AD4GKANK3HaMOFkoGaNY4n2tGe/iSwy7wVIvm1z5ZmZWTAhXn3sULTeD0njuzTVg8 ijSdD7icJ3Sr0OY6fgtZjw70BwbYfiHCjJcC9BsgQnEuJCKEKISxXzS/AVVTDDxDBP 1HAbmacUhVASIq+SvH1c7nz4J4KhAclnPo6i+tHk=
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd53.lss.emc.com u7HGhRlM007126
Received: from mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.22]) by maildlpprd55.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:42:00 -0400
Received: from MXHUB317.corp.emc.com (MXHUB317.corp.emc.com [10.146.3.95]) by mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id u7HGhLrE012727 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:43:22 -0400
Received: from MX307CL04.corp.emc.com ([fe80::849f:5da2:11b:4385]) by MXHUB317.corp.emc.com ([10.146.3.95]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:43:21 -0400
From: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-07.txt
Thread-Index: AQHR+DpdD8lXIIBEfU2PEGIUG+TS7qBMzDWAgACPEUA=
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 16:43:21 +0000
Message-ID: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F651382@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
References: <147140576545.19863.9587848371623367016.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20160817040701.GA24184@lst.de>
In-Reply-To: <20160817040701.GA24184@lst.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.97.73.54]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com
X-RSA-Classifications: public
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/biFRsnUef6Oihd0n3GtT-pmKhDM>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-07.txt
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 16:43:35 -0000

Looks good - one minor editorial suggestion at the end of the introduction:

OLD
   This new layout type also optimizes the I/O path by reducing the size
   of the LAYOUTCOMMIT payload.  Except for these changes the protocol
   is identical to [RFC5663], most importantly there are no changes to
   way the volume topology is built Section 2.3.2, and the data
   structures that describe extents Section 2.4 are unchanged compared
   to [RFC5663] as well.
NEW
   This new layout type also optimizes the I/O path by reducing the size
   of the LAYOUTCOMMIT payload.

   Aside from the changes summarized in the previous two paragraphs,
   the protocol is identical to [RFC5663], and specifically, there are no
   changes to data structures for volume topology (Section 2.3.2) and
   extents (Section 2.4).

Thanks, --David


> -----Original Message-----
> From: nfsv4 [mailto:nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christoph Hellwig
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 12:07 AM
> To: nfsv4@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-07.txt
> 
> This should address all the pending comments vs -06, both from
> Dave on the list and the ietf security and ops review.
> 
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 08:49:25PM -0700, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Network File System Version 4 of the IETF.
> >
> >         Title           : Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout
> >         Author          : Christoph Hellwig
> > 	Filename        : draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-07.txt
> > 	Pages           : 28
> > 	Date            : 2016-08-16
> >
> > Abstract:
> >    The Parallel Network File System (pNFS) allows a separation between
> >    the metadata (onto a metadata server) and data (onto a storage
> >    device) for a file.  The SCSI Layout Type is defined in this document
> >    as an extension to pNFS to allow the use SCSI based block storage
> >    devices.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout/
> >
> > There's also a htmlized version available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-07
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-07
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nfsv4 mailing list
> > nfsv4@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
> ---end quoted text---
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email