Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-07.txt
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Fri, 19 August 2016 14:15 UTC
Return-Path: <hch@lst.de>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41EB812D797 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 07:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.147
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MdZu-w9B-CFC for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 07:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C552C12DADE for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 07:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 212BE68D1E; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:14:44 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:14:44 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
Message-ID: <20160819141444.GA27160@lst.de>
References: <147140576545.19863.9587848371623367016.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20160817040701.GA24184@lst.de> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F651382@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F651382@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/dmKYP7hjHmdkmwq02G4owRThvss>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-07.txt
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:15:17 -0000
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 04:43:21PM +0000, Black, David wrote: > Aside from the changes summarized in the previous two paragraphs, > the protocol is identical to [RFC5663], and specifically, there are no > changes to data structures for volume topology (Section 2.3.2) and > extents (Section 2.4). The reason for my somewhat clumsy wording is that the scsi layout removes the "simple" volume type and instead add the "base" volume type to replace it instead, so strictly speaking there are changes in how the volume topology is defined. But if you can come up with a nice wording for that I'll happily change it and will send out a new version of the draft ASAP.
- Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-lay… Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-lay… Black, David
- Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-lay… Christoph Hellwig
- [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-… internet-drafts
- Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-lay… Black, David
- Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-lay… Christoph Hellwig