[nfsv4] Fwd: Adoption call for draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-security

Brian Pawlowski <beepee@gmail.com> Fri, 16 December 2022 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <beepee@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D001C1522BB; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 03:59:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JL5-PD3uFT0F; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 03:59:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb30.google.com (mail-yb1-xb30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b30]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7B71C1524B3; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 03:59:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb30.google.com with SMTP id 186so2080184ybe.8; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 03:59:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Dtszv1GDL7gGjl4NAhqUFPFjAHitssr+veNQcUDuVwc=; b=Ehb9XPN0DfLqn16wAiaQEHdwSNitP70/LftMH+qjIzs9EzETDAR00rNLjmunYfvBOx g3C7+h5NGznj/0/crr220ShYaEEDvebzDKSOzXAZkI4hmfhSXrcPOC2r6sLNNGZk6od/ zPxT1rS7TkFOdsTmmrAskHRrJax5AhSYsQsJFGNclbokUzHEBabsXqnohm2iRMcnxvhx EFBRtPhshezRazFDHF2fnmDcvWJwQDzpOLks2cwGFHm/Kh2JrjtErwK2fDEDhR3gslOW 5yPTHe6s/vSS9NVUlOQnBTAX0UVQYEyDFwOHia2J+xDevbXbDPLK8rwrn+OC4lA0kE4x 4yxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Dtszv1GDL7gGjl4NAhqUFPFjAHitssr+veNQcUDuVwc=; b=4ITmGbrvMVjDFV53rEHkh/JGQABSMiJds4oM3FI5t3wLOnA+cfo+V3LgR46n9q8By7 be6q6amhIMEYh0Z63yRbrSyL3dhMbTfvo8ikJp3TIlQqBCBo8r6Ud7NEUjnu1AHCYV1g Zb3ap4V65EGFi+x9/xKY6qou/e6RC6UCQeQiDMF9ny7qaG43g3rdO4GzU2cie1Rptdmr 4cejrTlKgNpoVGwDPzoTalgspLl/wo9lKB4qj1xEY6mO5OREEIbpUmlBZUBJRKyxNtFN zcCdNpfUxGTnlUOQwI+gxGLBrofQVnHFGiluWcYdFACH4ZyYZtV7CcfQpEl99gxItb/D 9EEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plVriSuSo1YLUIbEjbBPM6iVaVZDdkRRTbe143lGUmwpSAvxgvb wBZlJJ5dg7drZEMp28GQXFXc4mOEzL420kX1pzT2ed5r1Sl6NA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf68bIQfU1TqGMudlWdQ36WLneKNN/zj8OaJnKC/T0aYAyZnb5+EKwNbmm0XqjYtxmZOdBOcpWz2A0YVfTuocFY=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:e0cf:0:b0:713:e777:1a6b with SMTP id x198-20020a25e0cf000000b00713e7771a6bmr3505254ybg.542.1671191967610; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 03:59:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADaq8jfi1ApVZeJ6LsGSPY=kRXQ2W_NZ9ixwcOnJJ-A_RH4SPA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jfi1ApVZeJ6LsGSPY=kRXQ2W_NZ9ixwcOnJJ-A_RH4SPA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: beepee@gmail.com
From: Brian Pawlowski <beepee@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 03:59:16 -0800
Message-ID: <CAEo7hJHboTRVyNnu_7hVk348h2xVePvf+W2CH4VCNNg1tv888A@mail.gmail.com>
To: nfsv4-chairs <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>, nfsv4-ads@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000094bda205eff0b3fc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/lotXlTclOdctkLDjLfj8QN8ma6I>
Subject: [nfsv4] Fwd: Adoption call for draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-security
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 11:59:29 -0000

Good day, apologies for the inexcusable delay.

I am deferring final consensus call on this security to take on the
personal draft "draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-security which "It was written as part
of rfc5661bis effort and is intended to result in a standards-track
document." as a working group document.

I want to give Chris Inacio time to review draft prior to IETF 116. I will
redo the consensus call at IETF 116. This is not a judgment in any way on
the draft which is related to draft-dnoveck-nfsv4 which we just brought
into the working group. Please focus on draft-dnoveck-nfsv4 in WG right
now.

Are there any questions?

Brian Pawlowski
NFS V4 co-chair

P.S. Belated thanks to Chris for taking on editor role for
draft-dnoveck-nfsv4.

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:07 AM
Subject: Adoption call for draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-security
To: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Cc: nfsv4-chairs <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>, <nfsv4-ads@ietf.org>


This is an adoption call for draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-security.

This document describes nfsv4 security for all nfsv4 minor versions.  It
was written as part of rfc5661bis effort and is intended to result in a
standards-track document.  PAs stated in the abstract:

----

This document describes the core features of the NFSv4 family of protocols,
applying to all minor versions. The discuss includes use of security
features provided by RPC on a per-connection basis.

The current version of the document is intended,  in large part, to
resulting working group discussion regarding existing NFSv4 security issues
and to provide a framework for addressing these issues and obtaining
working group consensus regarding necessary changes.

When the resulting document is eventually published as an RFC, it will
supersede the description of security in existing minor version
specification documents such as RFC 7530 and RFC 8881.

----

The chairs would like to establish if there is interest in adopting this
document by the nfsv4 working group.  The call will run for two weeks until
the end of day on 10/26/2022 (UTC time).  Please send any objections or
expressions of support for adoption to the wg mailing list.

As stated previously, since I am the editor of this document, I will not be
involved in determining whether a consensus exists.  That responsibility
will fall to Brian with Zahed available to fill in if Brian is unable to
perform that role.