Re: [nfsv4] IETF 106 NFSv4 WG meeting

[Chuck Lever <[e-mail]>]

Hi Spencer-

tl/dr; I require no agenda time for an nfsv4 meeting during IETF 106.


> On Sep 14, 2019, at 5:13 PM, spencer shepler <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Scheduling requests are now open for IETF 106.
> 
> I would like to solicit input from the working group as to the need to meet at IETF106.
> 
> Please let me know by Sept 20th if we have agenda items that necessitate an IETF106 meeting.
> 
> Spencer
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/how/meetings/106/

Recognizing that your topic request deadline is tomorrow, since IETF
105, here is the progress on the five documents I have immediate
deliverables for:


* https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-integrity-measurement/

In August, I presented this proposed NFS extension to the Linux security
community. The discussion is ongoing. I expect this extension will be
accepted and merged into Linux. The document still needs some editorial
work before I request WGLC.


* https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls/

There are some pending review comments that need to be integrated into
this document before I submit a revision that can face another SecDir
review.


* https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data/

This document is Waiting for Write-Up.


* https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cel-nfsv4-rpcrdma-version-two/

I'm working on fleshing out the two technical items discussed during
IETF 105: a more flexible credit management mechanism, and a simple
mechanism for presenting host authentication material. When this work
is complete I will submit a draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-version-two-00.


* https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns/

My co-author is moving this document forward.


I have a few new work items, including this document:


* https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cel-nfsv4-comp-stor-reqs/

I plan to discuss this document next week in person with the SNIA
Computational Storage technical working group.


* Assistance with rfc5661bis and RFC 5661 errata

This is work that has arisen since IETF 105.


Among these items there is nothing urgent that requires Working Group
attention before IETF 107 in March 2020. Therefore I require no agenda
time for an nfsv4 meeting during IETF 106. If there are enough requests
for a meeting I do have things that can be discussed.


--
Chuck Lever