RE: [nfsv4] Re: [NFS] NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction / mask, draft-ietf-nfsv4-acls-00 not ready
"Yoder, Alan" <agy@netapp.com> Fri, 14 July 2006 20:02 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G1Ts2-0004g1-90; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:02:42 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G1Ts0-0004fw-S4 for nfsv4@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:02:40 -0400
Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G1Trz-00048K-K9 for nfsv4@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:02:40 -0400
Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124]) by mx2.netapp.com with ESMTP; 14 Jul 2006 13:02:39 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.06,244,1149490800"; d="scan'208"; a="393039573:sNHT17731532"
Received: from svlexc02.hq.netapp.com (svlexc02.corp.netapp.com [10.57.157.136]) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id k6EK2Y6s015871; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exsvlrb02.hq.netapp.com ([10.56.8.63]) by svlexc02.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:02:34 -0700
Received: from exsvl02.hq.netapp.com ([10.56.8.60]) by exsvlrb02.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:02:33 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [nfsv4] Re: [NFS] NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction / mask, draft-ietf-nfsv4-acls-00 not ready
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:05:13 -0700
Message-ID: <992BA60650F1584BA63E339312CE42030595891C@exsvl02.hq.netapp.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [nfsv4] Re: [NFS] NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction / mask, draft-ietf-nfsv4-acls-00 not ready
Thread-Index: AcanfdkjIOC9R3znQLSAc5dMm09qMQAAfiTQ
From: "Yoder, Alan" <agy@netapp.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jul 2006 20:02:33.0940 (UTC) FILETIME=[72264140:01C6A780]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2
Cc: Sam.Falkner@sun.com, wurzl_mario@emc.com, nfsv4@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org
> > Let me see if I understand. > > > > A POSIX ACL client sees ALLOW bfields READ+WRITE > > Not necessarily "POSIX ACL" clients, but clients that request the new > mask attributes. Such clients also understand that the relevant mask > makes that ALLOW effectively the same as just an allow of READ. The hell comes from having to explain this on the phone to mystified customers. It took years for the phone to stop ringing after Netapp's first multiprotocol implementation. In fact, it still hasn't completely stopped, in spite of a huge documentation and education effort. But it sounds like you're telling me an admin will never be able to see different permissions on files depending on what OS she happens to be looking at them with. Is that correct? Thanks, Alan =============================================================== Alan G. Yoder agy@netapp.com Technical Staff Network Appliance, Inc. 408-822-6919 =============================================================== _______________________________________________ nfsv4 mailing list nfsv4@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
- RE: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Noveck, Dave
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Lisa Week
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Andreas Gruenbacher
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… J. Bruce Fields
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Spencer Shepler
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Andreas Gruenbacher
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… J. Bruce Fields
- RE: [nfsv4] Re: [NFS] NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interac… Noveck, Dave
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: [NFS] NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interac… J. Bruce Fields
- RE: [nfsv4] Re: [NFS] NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interac… Yoder, Alan
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: [NFS] NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interac… J. Bruce Fields
- RE: [nfsv4] Re: [NFS] NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interac… Yoder, Alan
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: [NFS] NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interac… J. Bruce Fields
- RE: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Noveck, Dave
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Sam Falkner
- RE: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Noveck, Dave
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Sam Falkner
- RE: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Noveck, Dave
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… J. Bruce Fields
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Sam Falkner
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Sam Falkner
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Sam Falkner
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Andreas Gruenbacher
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Sam Falkner
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… J. Bruce Fields
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: [NFS] NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interac… Andreas Gruenbacher
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Andreas Gruenbacher
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Sam Falkner
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Andreas Gruenbacher
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Andreas Gruenbacher
- Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction /… Sam Falkner