[nfsv4] question about nfs41 features

Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@citi.umich.edu> Thu, 23 September 2010 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889853A69AE for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YCfsQBwZqu6g for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F193A67D4 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so2102996wyi.31 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=hvyqV3GImbbr+y981eEpGbhb9wfeyaN55CGmh9qfOF8=; b=mTUwp5hWdNKO9DRZCXW4abpYiyd/KfFLpd/LrUJfFcxYHE/iAGeCO41zHtKqB9M9By 26yBBEo8uKPDL7CdhcrcopXFFUNB7JrOW2Oo8PVypazBYTgmzLHUea8hwAWP284LVSmJ Z6fli8PY0q2YTzDOUsb2rl/XZOntCxbHVs20g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=MFgjpM1mY887cyjLMbKMJmxqIs5zMRxDE1bXM+sIV3baa/UmX6UpurVWhZYDzyJj0X Q7shs3MqWVkDtGKz2J3BBCbxS7ZFfWcpU9iOf85RVPUHmMx1h9SdE40ZBbzSTqRadLwt LhKTFNU4Lj6f8zka9zinQUMt0m3YQF9lE51rU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.155.7 with SMTP id i7mr8679316wek.59.1285269012923; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com
Received: by 10.216.168.13 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinvrHsQmcLCpt99dE1nU0md8zfwsh4vP8JRBJT6@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinvrHsQmcLCpt99dE1nU0md8zfwsh4vP8JRBJT6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 15:10:12 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7TXRj-xKBl9FMsJISr4hZ1R_Szo
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=b0K3=4ABNjAi1CRQmexYDeSrCYTpMUOjaC4yJ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@citi.umich.edu>
To: nfsv4@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [nfsv4] question about nfs41 features
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:13:35 -0000

I would greatly appreciate it I can get a reply from NFS41 server
implementers out there on the subject of whether or not the following
feature are (a) currently implemented by your server, (b) will be
implemented soon (1year), (c) having interest in being implemented
within the next few years and (d) are so low in priority that could be
said: will never be implemented.

volatile handles
named attributes
directory delegations
SSV
trunking (session or clientid)
segmented file layouts

recall of file layouts
cb_notify_deviceid
cb_getattr
cb_recall_slot
cb_notify_lock

Thank you.