Re: [Nfvrg] Trying to organize the live documents in NFVRG

[<[e-mail]>]

Dear All,

In the absence of any objections, we are glad to confirm Róbert Szabó and Norival Figueira as document editors for the “policy-based resource management” near-term work item.

Happy new year!

Thanks,
Ramki & Diego

From: Nfvrg [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Krishnan, Ramki
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 7:21 AM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Nfvrg] Trying to organize the live documents in NFVRG

Missed copying NFVRG, doing the same.

Thanks,
Ramki

From: Krishnan, Ramki
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 7:29 PM
To: '이승익' <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: '[e-mail]' <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: RE: Trying to organize the live documents in NFVRG

Hi Seungik,

There are several issues in having more than two document editors. The editors job is making sure the individual drafts are well represented in the final version and it our job as co-chairs to make sure that it indeed happens. You will have ample opportunities to work closely with the document editors and us to achieve the aforementioned goal. Also, you draft will stay independent as much as possible in the merge process. If you have any further concerns, please let us know.

Thanks,
Ramki

From: Krishnan, Ramki
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 7:43 AM
To: '이승익' <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Trying to organize the live documents in NFVRG

Many thanks Seungik for your interest. We will get back to you shortly.

Thanks,
Ramki
From: 이승익 [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 9:04 PM
To: Krishnan, Ramki <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Trying to organize the live documents in NFVRG

Ramki,

In order to well incorporate the service chain aspect as per draft-irtf-nfvrg-resource-management-service-chain,
let me also join the editing group.

Regards,
Seungik.

From: Nfvrg [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 10:45 AM
To: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [Nfvrg] Trying to organize the live documents in NFVRG

Dear All,

As a follow up to this email and the structuring of live documents discussion in the IETF 94 NFVRG meeting at Yokohama, we have Róbert Szabó and Norival Figueira volunteering as document editors for the “policy-based resource management” near-term work item. Our suggestion is to have Robert and Norival as document editors for this near-term work item. If you have any objections to this proposal, please let us know.

Thanks,
NFVRG co-chairs (Ramki & Diego)

From: Nfvrg [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 3:22 PM
To: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: [Nfvrg] Trying to organize the live documents in NFVRG

Hi,

Ramki and I have been discussing how to organize the live documents we have in the NFVRG, with the idea of maximizing productivity and avoiding the dispersion of efforts by a multiplicity of unrelated documents. Since the RG charter is wide enough to accommodate many different contributions, we have agreed to structure most documents around the following classes, according with the long-term goals:

* Those addressing one of the special interest areas and aimed at becoming a permanent contribution. We propose to keep one document per each area, intended to become an RFC once the work in that area is considered complete. Authors of such documents will be required to merge them with other related documents once they are adopted by the RG. The chairs will identify editors for each of these documents.
Just for you to remember, the four interest areas (identified in the RG wiki) are "Policy based Resource Management", "Analytics for Visibility and Orchestration", "Virtual Network Function (VNF) Performance Modeling to facilitate transition to NFV", and “Security and Service Verification”. The lack of proposals in the area of performance modeling is making us think of changing this area for another one (though this is something we need to discuss on a separate thread)

* Those addressing general issues of interest to the community, but related with a concrete points in time. Typical examples ara gap analysis or challenge reports (live documents per se) or project reports (associated to the project lifecycle) They will be acknowledged by adopting them once the community thinks they are mature enough to provide a clear value.

* General documents (specific findings, updates, etc) presented for information to and assessment by the community

We hope you’ll find this proposal agreeable, so Ramki and I can start structuring the agenda of our coming meetings around it, and begin to prepare a proposal to classify the live documents, and take the other necessary actions to apply the proposal.

Any kind of comments, suggestions and expression of support would be extremely welcome, specially the latter ones…

Be goode,

--
"Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"

Dr Diego R. Lopez
Telefonica I+D
http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/

e-mail: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Tel:    [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
----------------------------------


________________________________

Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição