Re: [NGO] comments on CANMOD BoF

Balazs Lengyel wrote:
> While agreeing that access control is important, I would also mention 
> that we just made the very first step for the DML. We still have many 
> months of hard work before us, so if we loose focus we are doomed.
> 

Fine -- forget access control.  Go back to telnet for all I care ;-)

But when drafts like partial locking have statements such as
"must have some access rights", that is a pretty clear indication
that the WG needs to consider issues like what is an access right?,
and what does it mean to 'have', 'permit' or 'deny' that access right?
Pretty basic stuff.

(Remember the emphatic reason the WG could not work on a standard
ACM 8 months ago?  "We don't understand the requirements!".
I'm glad that the WG understands them now :-)

> Balazs

Andy

_______________________________________________
NGO mailing list
NGO@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo