(ngtrans) draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement
itojun@iijlab.net Wed, 09 July 2003 08:37 UTC
Received: from brmea-mail-3.sun.com (brmea-mail-3.Sun.COM [192.18.98.34]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA24031 for <ngtrans-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 04:37:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from engmail2sun.Eng.Sun.COM ([129.144.134.19]) by brmea-mail-3.sun.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h698W31J027769; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 02:32:04 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (sunroof.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.168.88]) by engmail2sun.Eng.Sun.COM (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id h698VqUw027217; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 01:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.10.Beta1+Sun/8.12.10.Beta1) with ESMTP id h698Xs06004906 for <ngtrans-bumvof58w@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 01:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.10.Beta1+Sun/8.12.10.Beta1/Submit) id h698Xsw5004905 for ngtrans-bumvof58w; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 01:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from engmail2sun.Eng.Sun.COM (engmail2sun [129.144.134.19]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.10.Beta1+Sun/8.12.10.Beta1) with ESMTP id h698Xp06004898 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 01:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nwkea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.42.13]) by engmail2sun.Eng.Sun.COM (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9/ENSMAIL, v2.2) with ESMTP id h698VbUu027205 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 01:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [219.101.47.130]) by nwkea-mail-1.sun.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h698VVKo009971 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 01:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from itojun.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB35A0; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 17:31:29 +0900 (JST)
To: iesg@ietf.org
Cc: ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
Subject: (ngtrans) draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 17:31:26 +0900
Message-Id: <20030709083129.2DB35A0@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: itojun@iijlab.net
a couple of IETFs ago, it was suggested at the ngtrans wg meeting that the document draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement-xx "should be handed to SMTP experts in application area". since then, there has been no actions taken. the fact is, there is no active working group for SMTP and email-related activities. also ngtrans wg is concluded. therefore, the document is in "zombie" state. I still want the document (or the contents of it) be published, as it contains critical guidelines for IPv6/v4 dual stack SMTP operation. I would like to ask IESG to decide and take appropriate actions, such as: - poke SMTP experts, let them work on the topic and produce an RFC - let me handle the document as an individual submission and publish it as an RFC thanks. itojun