Re: (ngtrans) draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement
itojun@iijlab.net Wed, 09 July 2003 22:21 UTC
Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com (brmea-mail-2.Sun.COM [192.18.98.43]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA26641 for <ngtrans-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 18:21:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from engmail1mpk.Eng.Sun.COM ([129.146.1.45]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h69MDcvc027846; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 16:13:39 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (sunroof.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.168.88]) by engmail1mpk.Eng.Sun.COM (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id h69MDZUa007876; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 15:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.10.Beta1+Sun/8.12.10.Beta1) with ESMTP id h69MFa06009690 for <ngtrans-bumvof58w@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 15:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.10.Beta1+Sun/8.12.10.Beta1/Submit) id h69MFatD009689 for ngtrans-bumvof58w; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 15:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from engmail2sun.Eng.Sun.COM (engmail2sun [129.144.134.19]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.10.Beta1+Sun/8.12.10.Beta1) with ESMTP id h69MFX06009682 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 15:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com (brmea-mail-2.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.5.43]) by engmail2sun.Eng.Sun.COM (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9/ENSMAIL, v2.2) with ESMTP id h69MDJUu004436 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 15:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [219.101.47.130]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h69MDDvc027590 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 16:13:14 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from itojun.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495CD93; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 07:13:10 +0900 (JST)
To: iesg@ietf.org, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
In-reply-to: itojun's message of Wed, 09 Jul 2003 17:31:26 +0900. <20030709083129.2DB35A0@coconut.itojun.org>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 07:13:10 +0900
Message-Id: <20030709221310.495CD93@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: itojun@iijlab.net
> a couple of IETFs ago, it was suggested at the ngtrans wg meeting > that the document draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement-xx "should > be handed to SMTP experts in application area". since then, there > has been no actions taken. the fact is, there is no active working > group for SMTP and email-related activities. also ngtrans wg is > concluded. therefore, the document is in "zombie" state. you can find the last revision (06) at ftp.itojun.org:~ftp/pub/paper. itojun