Re: Fwd: Re: [Fwd: (ngtrans) Fwd: Draft Agenda for Yokohama]

Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> Tue, 02 July 2002 09:36 UTC

Received: from nwkea-mail-1.sun.com (nwkea-mail-1.sun.com [192.18.42.13]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA29557 for <ngtrans-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 05:36:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from engmail1.Eng.Sun.COM ([129.146.1.13]) by nwkea-mail-1.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA28428; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 02:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.168.88]) by engmail1.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id CAA02476; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 02:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g629Y6k7022320 for <ngtrans-dist@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 02:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g629Y6Oj022319 for ngtrans-dist; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 02:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: sunroof.eng.sun.com: majordomo set sender to owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com using -f
Received: from engmail1.Eng.Sun.COM (engmail1 [129.146.1.13]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g629Y3k7022309 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 02:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pheriche.sun.com (pheriche.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.5.34]) by engmail1.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL, v2.1p1) with ESMTP id CAA02446 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 02:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netcore.fi (netcore.fi [193.94.160.1]) by pheriche.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA16915 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 03:34:08 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g629Xo015439; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 12:33:50 +0300
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 12:33:50 +0300
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@cisco.com>
cc: ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [Fwd: (ngtrans) Fwd: Draft Agenda for Yokohama]
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20020702111848.01d61ca0@europe.cisco.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207021232380.15429-100000@netcore.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Francois Le Faucheur wrote:
> Actually, I had a quick look at RFC2026. My understanding of it is that
> the procedure recommended by IETF is to declare IPR to IETF Exec
> director and not to include any statement in the drafts themselves
> (apart from the standard IETF Intellectual Property statement). Is it
> not so?

I don't think this is a good practise.  Declaring IPR ("the lawyer
letter") naturally is sent to IETF Exec director, and not embedded in the
draft, but IMO it's a bad form not to include anything in the memo.

> At 18:05 28/06/2002 +0200, Francois Le Faucheur wrote:
> >Hi pekka,
> >
> >At 18:40 28/06/2002 +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
> >>Btw,
> >>
> >>It seems rather convenient that BGP Tunneling includes Cisco IPR, but
> >>that's not mentioned in the draft.  Hopefully that's mentioned in the
> >>transition scenarios.
> >
> >Cisco's IPR public statement on BGP Tunnel is available from IETF server's 
> >page on IPR.
> >
> >Yes, the plan is to add a statement on that in the next rev of BGP Tunnel 
> >draft. But we have not issued a next rev for Yokohama (ie most recent one 
> >dates January 2002) because although technical content seems pretty much 
> >agreed (after Last Call), it only makes sense to issue the next version 
> >when we understand how the draft would need to be finally packaged to go 
> >through IESG (eg modified applicability statement,...).
> >
> >Regarding the transition I-D, there is no statement. To me the statement 
> >really belongs to the BGP-Tunnel draft itself. But if you guys feel it 
> >should be in the transition I-D as well, we can add it in there.
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >Francois
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Francois Le Faucheur wrote:
> >>
> >> > just resending (had forgotten the ngtrans listr in cc:).
> >> > Francois
> >> >
> >> > >Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 11:48:10 +0200
> >> > >To: mrw@windriver.com,
> >> > >From: Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@cisco.com>
> >> > >Subject: Re: [Fwd: (ngtrans) Fwd: Draft Agenda for Yokohama]
> >> > >Cc: Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@cisco.com>,
> >> > >jeremy.de_clercq@alcatel.be, Alain Durand <alain.durand@sun.com>, Tony
> >> > >Hain <tony@tndh.net>
> >> > >
> >> > >Margaret,
> >> > >
> >> > >In line with your earlier request, I posted an I-D describing operational
> >> > >environments and transition scenarios where
> >> > ><draft-ietf-ngtrans-bgp-tunnel.xx> fits well. This draft is
> >> > ><draft-lefaucheur-bgp-tunnel-transition-00.txt> and will appear on the
> >> > >server soon.
> >> > >
> >> > >Unfortunately I only managed to work on it and post it just before the
> >> > >cut-off date, so there has not been any time to discuss it/reflect it in
> >> > >the work of the Design Teams.
> >> > >
> >> > >I would like to request a short slot in Yokohama to present these
> >> > >operational environements and transition scenarios. Is this possible?
> >> > >
> >> > >In the meantime, feed-back on the draft over the list is very welcome of
> >> > >course.
> >> > >
> >> > >Thanks
> >> > >
> >> > >Francois
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >>-------- Original Message --------
> >> > >>Subject: (ngtrans) Fwd: Draft Agenda for Yokohama
> >> > >>Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 13:39:33 -0400
> >> > >>From: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>
> >> > >>Reply-To: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>
> >> > >>To: ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
> >> > >>CC: Alain Durand <alain.durand@sun.com>,Tony Hain <tony@tndh.net>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Hi All,
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Attached please find a draft agenda for Yokohama.  Please let us
> >> > >>know if there are any comments, or if I have omitted any topics
> >> > >>that should be covered.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Thanks,
> >> > >>Margaret
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Next Generation Transition WG (ngtrans)
> >> > >>Wednesday, July 17 at 0900-1130
> >> > >>=======================================
> >> > >>
> >> > >>CHAIRS:  Alain Durand <alain.durand@suncom>
> >> > >>            Tony Hain <tony@tndh.net>
> >> > >>            Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>AGENDA:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Introduction and Agenda Bashing -- Chairs (5 min)
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Design Team Problem Statements/Scenarios
> >> > >>          - Overview of Design Team Concept -- Tony Hain (5 min)
> >> > >>          - 3GPP Team -- Jonne Soininen (10 min)
> >> > >>          - Unmanaged Networks Team -- Christian Huitema (10 min)
> >> > >>          - ISP Team -- Cleve Mickles (10 min)
> >> > >>
> >> > >>3GPP Transition Solutions -- Juha Wiljakka (15 min)
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Transition Mechanism Applicability
> >> > >>          - DSTM -- Jim Bound (10 min)
> >> > >>          - ISATAP -- Fred Templin (10 min)
> >> > >>
> >> > >>NAT64/NAT46 Mechanism -- Alain Durand (10 min)
> >> > >>
> >> > >>NGTrans Charter Discussion
> >> > >>          - Review Proposed Charter Wording -- Chairs (15 min)
> >> > >>          - Discuss On-going Work -- Chairs (15 min)
> >> > >>                  (What should progress, and what should wait
> >> > >>                  for design team output)
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Interim Meeting Discussion -- Margaret Wasserman (5 min)
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >>X-Authentication-Warning: sunroof.eng.sun.com: majordomo set sender to
> >> > >>owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com using -f
> >> > >>X-Sender: mrw@mail.windriver.com
> >> > >>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2
> >> > >>Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 14:07:31 -0400
> >> > >>To: ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
> >> > >>From: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>
> >> > >>Subject: (ngtrans) Fwd: Activities Update
> >> > >>Sender: owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
> >> > >>Reply-To: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Just a reminder...
> >> > >>
> >> > >>As I mentioned in my earlier message:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>We have asked the authors of ngtrans mechanisms to describe, either 
> >> in an
> >> > >>applicability statement
> >> > >>or in a companion document, specific scenarios where their proposal fits
> >> > >>better than other existing
> >> > >>work.  This information will be used by the design teams,as they work to
> >> > >>assemble complete transition
> >> > >>plans for the most likely transition scenarios.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>The ID cut-off date for -00 documents is Monday, June 24th at 9am EDT,
> >> > >>and the cut-off for
> >> > >>updates is Monday, July 1st.  So, please get these documents in as soon
> >> > >>as possible, in
> >> > >>order to help the design teams to better understand your work.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Thanks,
> >> > >>Margaret
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>--
> >>Pekka Savola                 "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
> >>Netcore Oy                   not those you stumble over and fall"
> >>Systems. Networks. Security.  -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords
> 

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy                   not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security.  -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords