Re: (ngtrans) Re: pTLA 3FFE:FFF0::/28 for test & example useper draft-blanchet-ipngwg-testadd-00.txt, closes 20Jun01
Dirk Ooms <Dirk.Ooms@alcatel.be> Thu, 07 June 2001 09:53 UTC
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id FAA02666 for <ngtrans-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 05:53:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from engmail4.Eng.Sun.COM ([129.144.134.6]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA07508; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 02:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.168.88]) by engmail4.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id CAA07031; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 02:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.11.4+Sun/8.11.4) id f579qHb28121 for ngtrans-dist; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 02:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from engmail4.Eng.Sun.COM (engmail4 [129.144.134.6]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.11.4+Sun/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f579qEe28114 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 02:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from saturn.sun.com (saturn.EBay.Sun.COM [129.150.69.2]) by engmail4.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL, v2.1p1) with ESMTP id CAA07018 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 02:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay1.alcatel.be (alc119.alcatel.be [195.207.101.119]) by saturn.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA22227; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 02:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Bemail06.net.alcatel.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay1.alcatel.be (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id f579q8V21782; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:52:08 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from alcatel.be ([138.203.65.20]) by Bemail06.net.alcatel.be (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 12-30-1999)) with SMTP id C1256A64.00363069; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:51:53 +0200
Message-ID: <3B1F4EB9.F87FF9AC@alcatel.be>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 11:51:53 +0200
From: Dirk Ooms <Dirk.Ooms@alcatel.be>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@sun.com>
CC: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, itojun@iijlab.net, Marc Blanchet <Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca>, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) Re: pTLA 3FFE:FFF0::/28 for test & example useper draft-blanchet-ipngwg-testadd-00.txt, closes 20Jun01
References: <Your message of "Thu, 07 Jun 2001 13:28:10 +0900." <27929.991888090@itojun.org> <5.1.0.14.0.20010606224915.0399be68@jurassic>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Dirk Ooms <Dirk.Ooms@alcatel.be>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Would it be good to also reserve a range of multicast addresses for the same purpose? dirk Alain Durand wrote: > > Itojun: > > > > marc's one is more like "how to write example configuration down onto > > > manual pages". since we don't know what IPv4 address the readers > > > would use, we cannot really generate 6to4 prefix. > > Keith: > > >a. perhaps this could be made clearer in the next version? > > the current draft implies more than once that these addresses > > could be used for testing or test networks, which is pretty > > close to saying they can be used for private operational networks. > > test networks sometimes evolve into operational networks if the > > test is successful. > > The real value of Marc's draft is to give a prefix that we can use in example, > like in RFCs, books, white paper, config example, etc... > like the 555 area code in the movies. > Having address space for test network is a very different thing. > We have itojun's draft for that or we can suggest to use site local addresses. > I would like to suggest to Marc to remove any reference to test networks in > a future -01 draft. > > >b. I wonder if 3FFE:FFF0:: addresses make good examples, since they > > will "look different" than addresses in typical use (outside of > > the 6bone). Also, might it be useful to have multiple example > > prefixes so that in examples citing addresses from different parts > > of the net the different prefixes would be easily distinguishable? > > All we need is something that looks like a real IPv6 address but that is not > allocated to anyone. I do not think that the fact that the address starts with > a 2 or a 3 is relevant. This is the reason why I suggested 3ffe:5550::/28 > to maintain the parallel with the 555 area code. > Also reserving a /28 prefix is large enough so any technical writer > can carve as many prefixes as needed out of it. > > - Alain. -- Dirk Ooms mailto:dirk.ooms@alcatel.be tel:+32 3 2404732 Network Strategy Group (NSG) http://aww.alcatel.com/nsg Alcatel http://www.alcatel.com
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: pTLA 3FFE:FFF0::/28 for test & … Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: pTLA 3FFE:FFF0::/28 for test & … Alain Durand
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: pTLA 3FFE:FFF0::/28 for test & … Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: pTLA 3FFE:FFF0::/28 for test & … Nathan Lutchansky
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: pTLA 3FFE:FFF0::/28 for test & … Brian Haberman
- RE: (ngtrans) Re: pTLA 3FFE:FFF0::/28 for test & … Dave Thaler
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: pTLA 3FFE:FFF0::/28 for test & … Marc Blanchet
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: pTLA 3FFE:FFF0::/28 for test & … Brian Haberman
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: pTLA 3FFE:FFF0::/28 for test & … Dirk Ooms