Re: (ngtrans) Do we need to update our draft?

Bob Fink <rlfink@lbl.gov> Sun, 27 December 1998 16:32 UTC

Message-Id: <4.1.19981227081029.01f9d5e0@cnrmail.lbl.gov>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 08:14:41 -0800
To: ngtrans@sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM
From: Bob Fink <rlfink@lbl.gov>
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) Do we need to update our draft?
Cc: h-higuti@ebina.hitachi.co.jp, atarashi@ebina.hitachi.co.jp, tsuchi@ebina.hitachi.co.jp
In-Reply-To: <199812110332.MAA19878@atlab.base.tuat.ac.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ngtrans@sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ngtrans@sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM

NGtrans folk,

I have not seen any comments on Kazuaki Tsuchiya's question to the list
about what to do next with their dual-stack I-D. If I don't hear anything
to the contrary next week, I will request that they submit a version ready
for "last call" for Experimental RFC forwarding in early January.


Thanks,

Bob

===
At 09:34 AM 12/11/98 +0900, Kazuaki Tsuchiya wrote:
>Dear Ngtrans folks,
>
>We presented our draft (draft-ietf-ngtrans-dual-stack-hosts-00.txt)
>at the Ngtrans' meetings the day before yesterday and the past.
>And also an experimental implementation is already available from
>our web server.
>    http://www.hitachi.co.jp/Prod/comp/network/pexv6-e.htm
>
>Then, we'd like to manage to make it "Experimental RFC".  Do we need
>to update it for that?  Where of it should we update?
>
>Please send your questions and comments to the Ngtrans. Comments/
>discussion on the mailing list are always welcome.
>
>Thanks.
>
>--Kazuaki Tsuchiya
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>Kazuaki Tsuchiya (E-mail:tsuchi@ebina.hitachi.co.jp)
>  Hitachi, Ltd.  Server & Network Development Division
>    Phone:+81-462-32-2111(ex.2458)   Fax:+81-462-35-8324

Re: (ngtrans) Do we need to update our draft? Bob Fink