(ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments?
Bob Fink <fink@es.net> Fri, 09 November 2001 17:33 UTC
Received: from patan.sun.com (patan.Sun.COM [192.18.98.43]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA20121 for <ngtrans-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 12:33:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM ([129.144.170.5]) by patan.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA20038; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 10:30:14 -0700 (MST)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.168.88]) by engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id IAA25152; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 08:22:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.2.Beta0+Sun/8.12.2.Beta0) with ESMTP id fA9GFvQO029977 for <ngtrans-dist@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 08:15:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.2.Beta0+Sun/8.12.2.Beta0/Submit) id fA9GFunr029976 for ngtrans-dist; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 08:15:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Authentication-Warning: sunroof.eng.sun.com: majordomo set sender to owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com using -f
Received: from engmail4.Eng.Sun.COM (engmail4 [129.144.134.6]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.2.Beta0+Sun/8.12.2.Beta0) with ESMTP id fA9GFsQO029969 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 08:15:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from patan.sun.com (patan.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.5.43]) by engmail4.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL, v2.1p1) with ESMTP id IAA20419 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 08:15:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postal3.es.net (postal3.es.net [198.128.3.207]) by patan.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA07601 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 09:15:32 -0700 (MST)
Received: from ([]) by postal3.es.net (Postal Node 3) with SMTP id GQF37091; Fri, 09 Nov 2001 08:15:31 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20011109080750.00af5ca8@imap2.es.net>
X-Sender: rlfink@imap2.es.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2001 08:15:27 -0800
To: ietf-822@imc.org, ietf-smtp@imc.org
From: Bob Fink <fink@es.net>
Subject: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments?
Cc: NGtrans List <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Bob Fink <fink@es.net>
Various SMTP list folk, Itojun has issued the following in response to various comments on his "ipv6-smtp-requirement" I-D that was about to be forwarded to the IESG for Informational RFC. The ngtrans chairs would like to forward this new -04 draft (see url below) to the IESG, but wish to have any response to this you may have first. Please forward comments to the ngtrans list (cc'd above) by next Friday, November 16. Thanks, Alain Durand / Bob Fink / Tony Hain ngtrans chairs ====== Hello, this is about draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement. After getting comments from SMTP community (a couple of SMTP-related mailing lists), I have submitted a new revision of draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement (now 04). It should be in the internet-draft repository as soon as editors do their thing. Comments and actions taken are summrized below. The changes are minor, and I don't think it necessary to go through ngtrans last call again. itojun - English needs to be improved the document went through proofread by a native English speaker (JJ Behrens of NTT MCL). - the SMTP sender algorithm should be clarified a bit tweaked it a bit, added reference to relevant IPv4-only RFC (RFC2821) to make it clearer - need to talk about situations where IPv4-only sender tries to deliver an email to IPv6-only MX added a little bit of text. === A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Next Generation Transition Working Group of the IETF. Title : IPv6 SMTP operational requirements Author(s) : M. Nakamura, J. Hagino Filename : draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement-04.txt Pages : 8 Date : 08-Nov-01 This document lists operational requirements for IPv6 SMTP and IPv6-capable MX DNS records. As IPv6 SMTP servers are deployed, it has become apparent that certain configurations are necessary in IPv6-capable MX DNS records for stable dual-stack (IPv4 and IPv6) SMTP operation. This document clarifies the problems that exist in the transition period between IPv4 SMTP and IPv6 SMTP. It also defines operational requirements for stable IPv4/v6 SMTP operation. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement-04.txt -end
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Randy Bush
- (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Bob Fink
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Jim Fleming
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Keith Moore
- RE: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Jeroen Massar
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Jim Fleming
- RE: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Christian Huitema
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? itojun
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? D. J. Bernstein
- RE: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Pekka Savola
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Jim Fleming
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Jim Fleming
- (ngtrans) Can we assume this it the "official" IC… Jim Fleming
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Keith Moore
- (ngtrans) Children and IPv6 Jim Fleming
- RE: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Randy Bush
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Pete Resnick
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: ipv6-smtp-requirement comments? Randy Bush