[nmrg] [mrw@windriver.com: Re: draft-irtf-nmrg-im-dm-02.txt (Informational RFC)]

Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@agitator.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> Tue, 24 September 2002 12:09 UTC

Received: from hansa.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (hansa.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de [134.169.34.81]) by agitator.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id g8OC9Z4s031315 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL); Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:09:35 +0200
Received: from hansa.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (schoenw@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hansa.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id g8OC9XCQ005202 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL); Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:09:33 +0200
Received: (from schoenw@localhost) by hansa.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) id g8OC9XqJ005199; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:09:33 +0200
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:09:33 +0200
Message-Id: <200209241209.g8OC9XqJ005199@hansa.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@agitator.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
To: Network Management Research Group <nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= version=2.20
X-Spam-Level:
Subject: [nmrg] [mrw@windriver.com: Re: draft-irtf-nmrg-im-dm-02.txt (Informational RFC)]
Sender: nmrg-admin@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
Errors-To: nmrg-admin@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
X-BeenThere: nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:nmrg-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/mailman/listinfo/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Network Management Research Group <nmrg.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/mailman/listinfo/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/pipermail/nmrg/>

Any comments on this?

/js

------- Start of forwarded message -------
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:39:16 -0400
To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
From: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: draft-irtf-nmrg-im-dm-02.txt (Informational RFC)
Cc: mibs@ops.ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <A451D5E6F15FD211BABC0008C7FAD7BC0EF25984@nl0006exch003u.nl
 .lucent.com>
Sender: owner-mibs@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.20

At 10:10 AM 9/20/02, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
>Hi MIB-ers
>
>I expect/suspect that this will end up on my desk for AD-review.
>So whoever has not seen it or commented on it, pls take a look
>and let me know if you have any serious issues or if you feel
>this is good work/information that you support.

The document is generally interesting and informative.

However, it uses the "SMIng developed by the IRTF NMRG group"
as an example, without siting any reference documents.  The
discussion should be removed or a normative reference to the
NMRG version of SMIng should be added.

Margaret
------- End of forwarded message -------