IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nmrg] [mrw@windriver.com: Re: draft-irtf-nmrg-im-dm-02.txt (Informational RFC)]

Aiko Pras <pras@ctit.utwente.nl> Wed, 25 September 2002 10:26 UTC

Received: from netlx009.civ.utwente.nl (netlx009.civ.utwente.nl [130.89.1.91]) by agitator.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id g8PAQg4r010598; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 12:26:42 +0200
Received: from ctit.utwente.nl (adsl219222.adsl.utwente.nl [130.89.209.66]) by netlx009.civ.utwente.nl (8.11.4/HKD) with ESMTP id g8PAPPf27785; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 12:25:25 +0200
Message-ID: <3D918F1B.5010504@ctit.utwente.nl>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 12:25:31 +0200
From: Aiko Pras <pras@ctit.utwente.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
CC: Network Management Research Group <nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Subject: Re: [nmrg] [mrw@windriver.com: Re: draft-irtf-nmrg-im-dm-02.txt (Informational RFC)]
References: <200209241209.g8OC9XqJ005199@hansa.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= version=2.20
X-Spam-Level:
Sender: nmrg-admin@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
Errors-To: nmrg-admin@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
X-BeenThere: nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:nmrg-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/mailman/listinfo/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Network Management Research Group <nmrg.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/mailman/listinfo/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/pipermail/nmrg/>

Probably the NMRG website should have an additional page with "outdated" 
documents, like old internet-drafts. We could then reference that page.

Aiko

Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> Any comments on this?
> 
> /js
> 
> ------- Start of forwarded message -------
> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:39:16 -0400
> To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
> From: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>
> Subject: Re: draft-irtf-nmrg-im-dm-02.txt (Informational RFC)
> Cc: mibs@ops.ietf.org
> In-Reply-To: <A451D5E6F15FD211BABC0008C7FAD7BC0EF25984@nl0006exch003u.nl
>  .lucent.com>
> Sender: owner-mibs@ops.ietf.org
> Precedence: bulk
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.20
> 
> At 10:10 AM 9/20/02, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> 
>>Hi MIB-ers
>>
>>I expect/suspect that this will end up on my desk for AD-review.
>>So whoever has not seen it or commented on it, pls take a look
>>and let me know if you have any serious issues or if you feel
>>this is good work/information that you support.
> 
> 
> The document is generally interesting and informative.
> 
> However, it uses the "SMIng developed by the IRTF NMRG group"
> as an example, without siting any reference documents.  The
> discussion should be removed or a normative reference to the
> NMRG version of SMIng should be added.
> 
> Margaret
> ------- End of forwarded message -------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email