Re: [nmrg] Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions-06

"Michael Behringer (mbehring)" <mbehring@cisco.com> Mon, 23 March 2015 23:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mbehring@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id D14981A1A57; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEFB1A0A6A; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nBP88bpUkYbH; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E3561A03A6; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2026; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1427152300; x=1428361900; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=g2bx5g9T/MTIUM+TEll4Kz7UOJ4DbbHGvjY/ILlp6QU=; b=OCuPUSIRs8fWNNuSEHLVrshKMfx+sMupBytLAUaTHXpOXE7fEPXxLTk2 yjY/LxmzAYX8rrXVdsGU5SgZhSPVxnwsMM1zannmjpQabcJHJIhiz+0KJ nlRdzOphMGuDt5WYk6rUbownEjYA0BSgQr397Nnkj1j9pyKa+H5j+xPfd s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BGCwCBnBBV/5pdJa1cgwZSWgTEFGuBT4V1AoEuOBQBAQEBAQEBfIQUAQEBBDo4EwQCAQgRBAEBAQoUCQcyFAkIAgQBEgiIJw3IWAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARqLIYREOAaDEYEWBZBPg26HGjqCdo9eIoIygTxvgUR/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,455,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="134644721"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Mar 2015 23:11:39 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com [173.37.183.87]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2NNBdqj031130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 23 Mar 2015 23:11:39 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.61]) by xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([173.37.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:11:38 -0500
From: "Michael Behringer (mbehring)" <mbehring@cisco.com>
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, "nmrg-chairs@ietf.org" <nmrg-chairs@ietf.org>, Lisandro Zambenedetti Granville <granville@inf.ufrgs.br>, "draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions.all@ietf.org" <draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions-06
Thread-Index: AQHQYDHXs9mzB8F/H0+z3pjHcq4jwZ0gq7cAgAoRFhA=
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 23:11:38 +0000
Message-ID: <3AA7118E69D7CD4BA3ECD5716BAF28DF22F1D781@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
References: <20150316214028.22340.27521.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <19FBF613-9EE6-4685-9C98-EC4EB1856117@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <19FBF613-9EE6-4685-9C98-EC4EB1856117@netapp.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.200.96]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nmrg/AYrw0MWN9rKp62tqWd6_pKquh48>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:18:41 -0700
Subject: Re: [nmrg] Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions-06
X-BeenThere: nmrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Management Research Group discussion list <nmrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/nmrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nmrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 23:11:43 -0000

I just posted -07, which has the requested minor changes based on Benoit's comments. 

Please take this document forward now. 
Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eggert, Lars [mailto:lars@netapp.com]
> Sent: 17 March 2015 03:27
> To: nmrg-chairs@ietf.org; Lisandro Zambenedetti Granville; draft-irtf-nmrg-
> autonomic-network-definitions.all@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-
> network-definitions-06
> 
> Should I take -06 forward, or is a rev coming?
> 
> On 2015-3-16, at 22:40, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > The IESG has completed a review of
> > draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions-06 consistent with
> RFC5742.
> >
> >
> > The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Autonomic Networking
> > - Definitions and Design Goals'
> > <draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions-06.txt> as an
> > Informational RFC.
> >
> >
> > The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in
> > the ANIMA working group, but this relationship does not prevent
> publishing.
> >
> > At the time of the ANIMA working group creation, this work was well
> > underway, and was therefore mentioned in the ANIMA charter. The
> ANIMA
> > working group will build on the definitions in this document.
> >
> > The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the
> > datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
> > merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
> > ballot and the history log.
> >
> > The IESG review is documented at:
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-ne
> > twork-definitions/
> >
> > A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-defi
> > nitions/
> >
> > The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > The IESG Secretary
> >
> >
> >