Re: [nmrg] Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions-06

["Eggert, Lars" <[e-mail]>]

Should I take -06 forward, or is a rev coming?

On 2015-3-16, at 22:40, The IESG <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> The IESG has completed a review of
> draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions-06 consistent with RFC5742.
> 
> 
> The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Autonomic Networking -
> Definitions and Design Goals'
> <draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions-06.txt> as an
> Informational RFC.
> 
> 
> The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in the
> ANIMA working group, but this relationship does not prevent publishing.
> 
> At the time of the ANIMA working group creation, this work was well
> underway, and was therefore mentioned in the ANIMA charter. The ANIMA
> working group will build on the definitions in this document.
> 
> The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the
> datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
> merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
> ballot and the history log.
> 
> The IESG review is documented at:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions/
> 
> A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions/
> 
> The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743  
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> The IESG Secretary
> 
> 
>