Re: [nmrg] Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis-04

["Eggert, Lars" <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

On 2015-3-17, at 01:43, Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]> wrote:
> This is  good news. The only suggestions I saw from the IESG are
> editorial and can be handled at AUTH48, unless anybody thinks a
> new draft is needed.

it's usually faster to re-spin a revision rather than explaining to the RFC Editor what to change how in AUTH48, but your call. Let me know if I should take -04 forward.

Lars

> 
> Regards
>   Brian Carpenter
> 
> On 17/03/2015 10:36, The IESG wrote:
>> The IESG has completed a review of draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis-04
>> consistent with RFC5742.
>> 
>> 
>> The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'General Gap Analysis for
>> Autonomic Networking' <draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis-04.txt> as an
>> Informational RFC.
>> 
>> 
>> The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in the
>> ANIMA working group, but this relationship does not prevent publishing.
>> 
>> At the time of the ANIMA working group creation, this work was well
>> underway,
>> and was therefore mentioned in the ANIMA charter. The ANIMA working group
>> will
>> build on the gap analysis in this document.
>> 
>> The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the
>> datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
>> merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
>> ballot and the history log.
>> 
>> The IESG review is documented at:
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis/
>> 
>> A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis/
>> 
>> The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743  
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> The IESG Secretary
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>