IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nmrg] Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis-04

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 17 March 2015 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 5B81C1A888A; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DD41A888A; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xXq9HXrpXEYU; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22a.google.com (mail-pd0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 180621A1BC0; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pdbop1 with SMTP id op1so17315208pdb.2; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fV5TzisMrztKdhMzQm4sUsXfNpZzn/q6EiehKCgPDvk=; b=vtk1A0eoyJo3O5VeCC9+eJHo8BxYjRr6eSgZ00n1a/BnL87roiUpwMfvjyk2q/hqKY rs10LUdJZzNyiKjVnVUQMskLYWFse4pSzYiKmTGytPobS3lqg+EcOVLOuBEr9lPRF1G3 527VZYcoST5HStb6tHebhSUYTvu5IHk39Bucl/UhhLGaD9BGULuie31pDCyPQZBU8CGs snfMQ138DUPp7f4vrPs21DF3ws/5Qdl351v0nVMZuRxjgqX5zo/cMzhJ8XMDYFq8+gkt 8AlgfkeWon62bIzUXyn0/PzJGx/J1z+z1U1Kudqyb+rwaSdA6w4yMfpwstn16B49Kwsy 3BNA==
X-Received: by 10.70.88.41 with SMTP id bd9mr124036984pdb.41.1426618122763; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:690c:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:690c:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id or3sm23626065pdb.15.2015.03.17.11.48.39 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5508770A.8030907@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 07:48:42 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
References: <20150316213621.18250.84367.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <550778AC.4090701@gmail.com> <45060A0F-C8D7-4750-9717-0A1917289B1F@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <45060A0F-C8D7-4750-9717-0A1917289B1F@netapp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nmrg/FPGAyumA3rCpOwS37aDBQV0gtlg>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:50:28 -0700
Cc: "draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis.all@ietf.org" <draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis.all@ietf.org>, "nmrg-chairs@ietf.org" <nmrg-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nmrg] Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis-04
X-BeenThere: nmrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Management Research Group discussion list <nmrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/nmrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nmrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:48:47 -0000

Oh, OK, I will do that when the submission tool reopens.

   Brian
On 17/03/2015 21:25, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2015-3-17, at 01:43, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This is  good news. The only suggestions I saw from the IESG are
>> editorial and can be handled at AUTH48, unless anybody thinks a
>> new draft is needed.
> 
> it's usually faster to re-spin a revision rather than explaining to the RFC Editor what to change how in AUTH48, but your call. Let me know if I should take -04 forward.
> 
> Lars
> 
>>
>> Regards
>>   Brian Carpenter
>>
>> On 17/03/2015 10:36, The IESG wrote:
>>> The IESG has completed a review of draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis-04
>>> consistent with RFC5742.
>>>
>>>
>>> The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'General Gap Analysis for
>>> Autonomic Networking' <draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis-04.txt> as an
>>> Informational RFC.
>>>
>>>
>>> The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in the
>>> ANIMA working group, but this relationship does not prevent publishing.
>>>
>>> At the time of the ANIMA working group creation, this work was well
>>> underway,
>>> and was therefore mentioned in the ANIMA charter. The ANIMA working group
>>> will
>>> build on the gap analysis in this document.
>>>
>>> The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the
>>> datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
>>> merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
>>> ballot and the history log.
>>>
>>> The IESG review is documented at:
>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis/
>>>
>>> A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis/
>>>
>>> The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743  
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> The IESG Secretary
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email