IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nmrg] Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis-04

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 17 March 2015 00:43 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 783B41A1BEC; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B431ACD85; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17_NtRLA_yAR; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22f.google.com (mail-pd0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D57FD1A1BEC; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pdbni2 with SMTP id ni2so73241625pdb.1; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uuUWWZGQeCPhH2XuC29V/f+qx/RxfvbbvZLWEPmQdNw=; b=izRf3/if/XQiLn3k06yATV/88ZD8gy5EOpz5WiO3HCMgRa8wIIIhS9B+e7mQ8bMfRn 7dxJcKO9bb4NKWVFAjbnMR7UVLVvBxZbKc0nVKyNszRWFikk9oFN4aTWMUunbodEaS9M +M07OYSdspw9vZePKFhVK11VohP7nDqXY2K+iG/nxwIE9UI+/Rq/AuaNk1HbexoU3aVR tX9NWvgPOxmFKzuwx2dJmA+5vQVQ9x9FPVdrxAkTIR8JUTt6I8L1cT3uQ9tXEciGyIip DajUgx3vQi5dcYbzW367ITPCe4rMpczQsCbhbGO07ypTRQKj9lXZhVn37Xi+XPoZPvjR Y5uw==
X-Received: by 10.70.90.161 with SMTP id bx1mr70479123pdb.146.1426553006531; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:df0:0:2006:c0da:ac17:5f6d:8e76? ([2001:df0:0:2006:c0da:ac17:5f6d:8e76]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pu9sm19197626pdb.49.2015.03.16.17.43.23 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <550778AC.4090701@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:43:24 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: nmrg-chairs@ietf.org, draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis.all@ietf.org, granville@inf.ufrgs.br
References: <20150316213621.18250.84367.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150316213621.18250.84367.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nmrg/saGZBwyKHTVc6_a0nQWaJ0xYFoQ>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:32:34 -0700
Subject: Re: [nmrg] Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis-04
X-BeenThere: nmrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Management Research Group discussion list <nmrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/nmrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nmrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:43:28 -0000

Hi,

This is  good news. The only suggestions I saw from the IESG are
editorial and can be handled at AUTH48, unless anybody thinks a
new draft is needed.

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 17/03/2015 10:36, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has completed a review of draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis-04
> consistent with RFC5742.
> 
> 
> The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'General Gap Analysis for
> Autonomic Networking' <draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis-04.txt> as an
> Informational RFC.
> 
> 
> The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in the
> ANIMA working group, but this relationship does not prevent publishing.
> 
> At the time of the ANIMA working group creation, this work was well
> underway,
> and was therefore mentioned in the ANIMA charter. The ANIMA working group
> will
> build on the gap analysis in this document.
> 
> The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the
> datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
> merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
> ballot and the history log.
> 
> The IESG review is documented at:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis/
> 
> A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis/
> 
> The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743  
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> The IESG Secretary
> 
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email