Re: [nmrg] call for adoption as RG document : draft-francois-nmrg-ai-challenges

Hi,

Thanks for the feedback. We'll integrate it in the RG version of the doc to be 
submitted.

Best regards
jerome

Le 02/05/2023 à 20:51, Dhruv Dhody a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure what happened to the RG adoption of this I-D. But FWIW I do 
> support it!  I have some minor comments while reading -
>
> (1) It is unusual to see SHOULD in the abstract. I suggest keeping that for the 
> body of the draft and not abstract. Also expand AI, NM on first use in the abstract.
>
> (2) Expand on first use - ML, SVM, ANN, SDN, MILP, VNF, SFC. Some of these might 
> also benefit from informative references if easily available.
>
> (3) If we talk about human bias in "..guided by an AI system to avoid human 
> bias"; I wonder if we need to also acknowledge the inherent bias that can also 
> exist in AI.
>
> (4) Section 3 formatting is off!
>
> (5) s/combinzatorially/combinatorially/
>
> (6) Add reference for BPF
>
> (7) s/This leads so the/This leads to the/
>
> (8) Add reference to Intent and IBN as well as for the text around Alpha Go. 
> Also digital twin!
>
> (9) Please expand on Security Consideration. I also suggest having an explicit 
> Privacy Consideration section as well
>
> Thanks!
> Dhruv
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 1:41 PM Laurent Ciavaglia (Nokia) 
> <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com> wrote:
>
>     Dear NMRG,
>
>       
>
>     This message starts the call for adoption as RG document for:
>
>     Research Challenges in Coupling Artificial Intelligence and Network Management - draft-francois-nmrg-ai-challenges
>
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-francois-nmrg-ai-challenges/
>
>       
>
>     Please let us know if you support or not the work becoming a RG document.
>
>       
>
>     In all cases, provide detailed comments to support your opinion and send them on the mailing list.
>
>       
>
>     We are particularly interested in assessing the following aspects:
>
>       
>
>     1.NMRG being a *research* group it is important to articulate well the problem(s), challenge(s) and research questions.
>
>       
>
>     2.Is the scientific soundness of the draft satisfying? (quality of the scientific proposition, rigor of the method, impact) ; "the measure of success is the quality and impact of the research results" [RFC2014]
>
>       
>
>     The procedure for RG document adoption and important criteria are detailed here:https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nmrg/CVEyLUvfxJk1Ud5WdM9Y5LGvQmU
>
>       
>
>     The call for adoption is open for two weeks and ends on February 1st, 2023.
>
>       
>
>     Best regards, NMRG chairs
>
>     Laurent & Jérôme
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     nmrg mailing list
>     nmrg@irtf.org
>     https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nmrg mailing list
> nmrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg