Re: nntp-extensions Re: ietf-nntp NNTP SEARCH extension internet-draft available

Brian Kantor <brian@nothing.ucsd.edu> Thu, 31 October 1996 16:05 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa00165; 31 Oct 96 11:05 EST
Received: from PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13404; 31 Oct 96 11:05 EST
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA10546 for ietf-nntp-outgoing; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 10:02:37 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: pheasant.ACADEM.COM: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-nntp using -f
Received: from academ.com (root@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA10539 for <ietf-nntp@PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM>; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 10:02:33 -0600
Received: from nothing.ucsd.edu (nothing.ucsd.edu [132.239.1.4]) by academ.com (8.7.6/8.7.1) with SMTP id KAA05852; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 10:02:30 -0600 (CST)
Received: by nothing.ucsd.edu (8.6.12/UCSDGENERIC.5) id IAA03926 to ; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 08:01:27 -0800
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 08:01:27 -0800
From: Brian Kantor <brian@nothing.ucsd.edu>
Message-Id: <199610311601.IAA03926@nothing.ucsd.edu>
To: moore@cs.utk.edu, natba@ims.microsoft.com, sob@academ.com
Subject: Re: nntp-extensions Re: ietf-nntp NNTP SEARCH extension internet-draft available
Cc: bhern@netscape.com, ietf-nntp@academ.com, imap@cac.washington.edu, natba@microsoft.com, nntp-extensions@academ.com, rsalz@osf.org
Sender: owner-ietf-nntp@academ.com
Precedence: bulk

Stan, I think we should continue the NNTP effort.  If some other
protocol should become more popular for reading news, whether because
of its technical merit or for more prosaic reasons, that does not
negate the effort.  I see no reason why there cannot be many mansions
in one house; the more there are to choose from [as they say about
standards] the more likely people are to find one that suits them
best.

I have no problem with an IMAP news reader service living on one port,
an NNRP news reader service on another, and so on.  Clients will
connect appropriately.

The only sad part is that we're wasting so much time trying to find
the "one true answer" when it doesn't exist.
	- Brian