Re: [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 03 February 2010 14:29 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38813A6A1F; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:29:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.614
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.614 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DjsKa4qwad+P; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:29:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0473A6A10; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:29:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950C42D28B; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:30:07 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OFPVkGpcntG1; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:30:07 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C4F2D275; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:30:06 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4B69886E.4080606@piuha.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:30:06 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
References: <4B694DC4.7060705@ericsson.com> <201002031355.o13Dt0ij008848@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <201002031355.o13Dt0ij008848@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, NSIS <nsis@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
X-BeenThere: nsis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Next Steps in Signaling <nsis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nsis>
List-Post: <mailto:nsis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:29:27 -0000
Thomas, > I don't necessarily have an opinion about the proposed changes, but I > don't quite understand the rationale. > > "Specification Required" is intended to allow for publication of > documents outside of RFCs. It reqiures an Expert Reviewer to look at > the document and make a determination about whether the spec is > sufficiently implementable. I do not understand this either, but I'll note that draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp has a ton of Standards Action IANA rules. It does not make sense to have such rules in a spec that itself is going for Experimental. So maybe Magnus should have said s/Specification Required/Standards Action/ in his e-mail... I would support the change of Standards Action rules to IETF Review. Jari
- [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA … Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of I… Thomas Narten
- Re: [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of I… Jari Arkko
- Re: [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of I… Thomas Narten
- Re: [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of I… Jari Arkko
- Re: [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of I… Thomas Narten
- Re: [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of I… Magnus Westerlund