Re: [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Wed, 03 February 2010 14:57 UTC
Return-Path: <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF1D28C119; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:57:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.932
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.932 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.333, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M1fP4Q1PfMYq; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:57:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com (e39.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.160]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0F53A6C50; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:57:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e39.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o13Eou6U025902; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:50:56 -0700
Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (d03av05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.85]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o13EwDkI022438; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:58:13 -0700
Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o13EwCfK026373; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:58:12 -0700
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (sig-9-49-146-246.mts.ibm.com [9.49.146.246]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o13EwBBU026297 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:58:12 -0700
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.12.5) with ESMTP id o13EwAXP017621; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:58:10 -0500
Message-Id: <201002031458.o13EwAXP017621@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-reply-to: <4B698DDE.2050405@piuha.net>
References: <4B694DC4.7060705@ericsson.com> <201002031355.o13Dt0ij008848@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <4B69886E.4080606@piuha.net> <201002031446.o13Ekknw017361@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <4B698DDE.2050405@piuha.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> message dated "Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:53:18 +0200."
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:58:10 -0500
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, NSIS <nsis@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
X-BeenThere: nsis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Next Steps in Signaling <nsis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nsis>
List-Post: <mailto:nsis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:57:39 -0000
> I agree, but in this case the issue is even more fundamental than the > document structure. If FOO is experimental technology, does it make > sense to require that extensions of FOO are standards? Ah, I see now. And I agree with you -- it doesn't seem to make sense! Thomas
- [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA … Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of I… Thomas Narten
- Re: [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of I… Jari Arkko
- Re: [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of I… Thomas Narten
- Re: [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of I… Jari Arkko
- Re: [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of I… Thomas Narten
- Re: [NSIS] Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of I… Magnus Westerlund