Re: [NSIS] [tsv-area] FSA signalling issues

JOHN ADAMS <j.l.adams1@btinternet.com> Wed, 27 August 2008 08:55 UTC

Return-Path: <nsis-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: nsis-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-nsis-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C1B3A6C57; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A4D3A68BD for <nsis@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.576
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.022, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id flmijQSEnzUF for <nsis@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web86504.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web86504.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.13.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 637A03A679C for <nsis@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 40615 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Aug 2008 08:07:05 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=a4R29jQe/uQqsxzeKOG8FEdQJ6xt7VdtTDpRt1w5DphHPUKjdPgPsK/q0a7Mo6zjF7t0BeDbeJ7b3cMX7FlUIk+gcszJDnDE4cEM636ADP9clkdFSvplOBOTFnmjGbBG5crRfDLwWPlUZ7tg/5na+D6uN18gn5AWDnDdpKdzglI=;
X-YMail-OSG: 3QJxPEUVM1m1jeakc0ycAIoiF4NHeJI8QBfQLHkfDFNvt9tKT_PgyOEEn7dCX8W9sv4HSwj1KfuUiv9yBEoFkwcWY58gzkeUUTkJMrq_ou8XyZqP2N3TyAhxkV0M5Fg-
Received: from [81.157.227.255] by web86504.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:07:04 GMT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1042.40 YahooMailWebService/0.7.218.2
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:07:04 +0000
From: JOHN ADAMS <j.l.adams1@btinternet.com>
To: Roland Bless <bless@tm.uka.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <350454.40136.qm@web86504.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:55:51 -0700
Cc: tsv-area@ietf.org, "nsis@ietf.org" <nsis@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [NSIS] [tsv-area] FSA signalling issues
X-BeenThere: nsis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Next Steps in Signaling <nsis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/nsis>
List-Post: <mailto:nsis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1889458764=="
Sender: nsis-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: nsis-bounces@ietf.org

Roland,
 
Thanks. 
 
Please keep in touch. I will take a look at NSIS.
 
John




----- Original Message ----
From: Roland Bless <bless@tm.uka.de>
To: JOHN ADAMS <j.l.adams1@btinternet.com>
Cc: tsv-area@ietf.org; "nsis@ietf.org" <nsis@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2008 8:17:51 AM
Subject: Re: [tsv-area] FSA signalling issues

Hi John,

JOHN ADAMS wrote:
> I gave a talk at Dublin in the Transport Area Open meeting. The subject
> was developments
> at the ITU-T on Flow State Aware (FSA) standardisation.
>  
> A question raised at the IETF was (roughly) "why isn't a new extension
> of RSVP being proposed
> to accommodate the requirements of FSA signalling?"
>  
> I attach an intial response to that question in the form of an issues
> list that will also be proposed as
> a new Appendix of the draft ITU Recommendation Q.flowstatesig. The
> conclusions of this first
> analysis are that:
> - it is an aim that we try our hardest to fit within the preferred
> architectural framework of RSVP
> - however there are a number of challenging issues and, since that is
> the case, the preferred approach
>    is to keep other options open.
>  
> Please get back to me with issues that will help the continued progress
> of FSA at the next IETF

It seems that the work in the NSIS WG would be a much better fit
to FSA than RSVP. Furthermore, since it is easier to extend NSIS
than RSVP, you should definitely have a look at the work there.

http://tools.ietf.org/wg/nsis/

However, I have to look at the FSA in order to better understand
your objectives and to find a good match...

Regards,
Roland
_______________________________________________
nsis mailing list
nsis@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis