RE: [NSIS] Initial ID on Signalling Requirements

Hi Jukka

Comparing the problem statements presented in the NSIS BOF
during the 50th IETF meeting with the problem statement 
given in this preliminary charter, I have the impression 
that there is a mismatch.

I hope that this mismatch will be solved in the next version of the charter.

Best regards,
Georgios

-----Original Message-----
From: Jukka Manner [mailto:jmanner@cs.Helsinki.FI]
Sent: donderdag 1 november 2001 15:38
To: Scott Bradner
Cc: nsis@ietf.org; mankin@isi.edu
Subject: Re: [NSIS] Initial ID on Signalling Requirements

	Hi,

	I tried to say, that I could write specifically about the
"requirements", not about solutions, yet. I discussed with John about NSIS
and an actual problem statement, as we did in Seamoby, but he said the
problem was actually presented in the charter, and thus the requirements
were the next/first thing. So, that is what I am proposing to do before
the SLC meeting.

	Regards,

	Jukka

On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Scott  Bradner wrote:

> please do get IDs in with ideas that you have but please do not be
> constrained by existing IDs - NSIS should be looking at
> signaling and not be limited to a particular type of signaling
> in a particular media
>
> note also that we are in the 'what is the problem' phase not 'here
> is a solution' phase - it is too eraly to be proposing specific technology
>
> Scott
>
> ------
>
> >From nsis-admin@ietf.org  Thu Nov  1 09:12:15 2001
> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 16:14:11 +0200 (EET)
> From: Jukka Manner <jmanner@cs.helsinki.fi>
> To: nsis@ietf.org
> Subject: [NSIS] Initial ID on Signalling Requirements
> In-Reply-To: <0C1353ABB1DEB74DB067ADFF749C4EEF5D8F5A@esebe004.NOE.Nokia.com>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> Sender: nsis-admin@ietf.org
> Errors-To: nsis-admin@ietf.org
> X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
> Precedence: bulk
> List-Id: Next Steps in Signaling <nsis.ietf.org>
> X-BeenThere: nsis@ietf.org
>
>
> 	Hi,
>
> 	I just remembered that the deadline for initial versions of IDs is
> in two weeks. The WG charter suggests an initial version of the signalling
> requirements to be ready in December, but would that before of after Salt
> Lake City? It might be a good idea to have it as a basis for the NSIS
> meeting in SLC, so it must be submitted in two weeks.
>
> 	As NSIS is not yet a WG, I suggest to create the first version of
> the requirements as an individual ID. I could take as basis
>
> 	- the NSIS BOF report (draft-bradner-nsis-bof-00.txt),
> 	- the MIP QoS document (draft-chaskar-mobileip-qos-01.txt), and
> 	- issues raised on the mailing list.
>
> 	Would that sound ok? John, Scott, any comments?
>
>
> 	Regards,
>
> 	Jukka
>
> --
>
> Jukka MJ Manner                  Voice:  +358+(0)9+191 44210
> Research Scientist               Fax:    +358+(0)9+191 44441
> Department of Computer Science   Mobile: +359+(0)50+320 3018
> University of Helsinki           E-mail: jmanner@cs.Helsinki.Fi
> P.O. Box 26, FIN-00014           WWW:    www.cs.Helsinki.Fi/u/jmanner/
> UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI, Finland  Office: B433
>                        "Believe in Angels"
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nsis mailing list
> nsis@ietf.org
> http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis
>

_______________________________________________
nsis mailing list
nsis@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis

_______________________________________________
nsis mailing list
nsis@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis