IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09.txt

Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Tue, 23 June 2020 12:06 UTC

Return-Path: <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0B23A188A for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ku4EsgM0ZwNt for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.uni-regensburg.de (mx1.uni-regensburg.de [194.94.157.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D75553A0C23 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id A3B4F6000054 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:06:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de (gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.5.51]) by mx1.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8436000051 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:06:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from uni-regensburg-smtp1-MTA by gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:06:03 +0200
Message-Id: <5EF1F02A020000A100039B3D@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 18.2.1
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:06:02 +0200
From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, stenn@nwtime.org
References: <159282479414.12546.4960020164033916211@ietfa.amsl.com> <6941954c-07cb-2067-50b0-4e718dff110a@nwtime.org> <11226_1592838104_5EF0C7D8_11226_82_1_3B598EB4-FCCE-4AD6-B524-7D35A05494F0@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <11226_1592838104_5EF0C7D8_11226_82_1_3B598EB4-FCCE-4AD6-B524-7D35A05494F0@akamai.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/-4bOx_5Pb6XCn76d0rgPivkohc8>
Subject: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09.txt
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:06:09 -0000

>>> "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> schrieb am 22.06.2020 um 17:01
in Nachricht
<11226_1592838104_5EF0C7D8_11226_82_1_3B598EB4-FCCE-4AD6-B524-7D35A05494F0@akama
.com>:

>>    If the document is Informational, why remove several occurrences of:
> 
>        The reference implementation daemon requires authentication for
>        this command.
> 
> I believe the WG does not wish to convey "reference implementation"  I would 
> support keeping the sentence, perhaps, if it said "some"

BUT wouldn't it make sense to agree on whether a command requires authentication or not? Leaving it to the implementer will not improve interoperability (if any).

> 
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email