IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] My current thoughts / NTS4PTP status

martin.langer@ptb.de Tue, 20 February 2024 09:39 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.langer@ptb.de>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B64C14F61D; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 01:39:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ptb.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CMFLRtES019G; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 01:39:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.bs.ptb.de (mx1.bs.ptb.de [192.53.103.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 446D9C14F694; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 01:39:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from s23397.bs.ptb.de ([172.21.101.132]) by mx1.bs.ptb.de with ESMTP id 41K9dgWd023226-41K9dgWf023226 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:39:42 +0100
In-Reply-To: <ZdRjDfGycqKcW6ib@localhost>
References: <OF3F043201.CF8CBB9A-ONC1258AAF.004C79AA-C1258AAF.004C79AB@ptb.de> <ZdRjDfGycqKcW6ib@localhost>
To: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Cc: ntp@ietf.org, ntp <ntp-bounces@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: martin.langer@ptb.de
Message-ID: <OF35D02A82.79098D2A-ONC1258AC9.0034DACE-C1258AC9.00351205@ptb.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:39:40 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00351203C1258AC9_="
X-FEAS-Client-IP: 172.21.101.132
X-FE-Policy-ID: 5:5:5:SYSTEM
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; d=ptb.de; s=s1-ptbde; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=references:to:cc:mime-version:subject:from:message-id:date:content-type; bh=9odXqpX8+6F+a9jZMCdU+fD2rSFUe16z4f5tp+j3ZnE=; b=xPwMJovT/W3WV3qOvETFNKc8D4sXjZx9mmvtGdDzaSUzJ/Gxwm+WfQPgFPEDNI+V5Frt/YsVItf2 98ZpXbvS7h/XPtiT7gVbFOxaZ5g0OxIwnlXKVtDoNduAiiCnsUFbJEjWhnL3cJDvYKFP+cUtwAjp Ud2luU6MLygL3Q/ApPnD7g7pP1ZSctBEtSJ0GXOreVKcL0JFcQuRNIZGbBMUcvz+wRUASKKoCrZo /CjeXUp1pMnSkT/+P3S26C4gs5QxxoAaiGxiFAwevmYxuDGPgLt5gTzcXP8jgblmQl8n5yQl1ilS dRXmOiYX0MI2qiFCL3LvKs/O7G/cra/awQx+bQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/0MBfA1c-nNhgsZl9q0ZjDcTJJeQ>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] My current thoughts / NTS4PTP status
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:39:52 -0000

Hello Miroslav,

it looks good. Thank you for updating the text.

kind regards,
Martin


__________________________________________

Dr.-Ing. Martin Langer
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) 
Working Group 4.42 "Dissemination of Time"
Bundesallee 100,
38116 Braunschweig (Germany)
Tel.: +49 531 592-4470
E-Mail: martin.langer@ptb.de
__________________________________________



Von:    "Miroslav Lichvar" <mlichvar@redhat.com>
An:     martin.langer@ptb.de
Kopie:  ntp@ietf.org
Datum:  20.02.2024 09:30
Betreff:        Re: [Ntp] My current thoughts / NTS4PTP status
Gesendet von:   "ntp" <ntp-bounces@ietf.org>



On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 02:55:18PM +0100, martin.langer@ptb.de wrote:
>    @Miroslav: Thanks for adding the requested content.
>    I have one small comment: In chapter 2 (PTP transport for NTP)
>    it would be worth mentioning that the values (e.g. lengthField)
>    are in network byte order.

I updated the text to the following:

       The NTP TLV is an organization-specific TLV having the
       following fields (with octets in network order):

Let me know if you think that is not sufficient.

Thanks,

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar

_______________________________________________
ntp mailing list
ntp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email