IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] My current thoughts / NTS4PTP status

Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> Tue, 20 February 2024 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <mlichvar@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7905DC14F5F3 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:30:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UWMLbB6DS8uE for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:30:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 112B4C14F5E9 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:30:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1708417811; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3L5TqOjNbsGTc9fZwFTq3c4UryGsqKAsUpSJoAgNZfE=; b=XKaIMzgJcnskQfexBBj2bpzowJc0xTyMUlP7q7Z9vlgHfN+XqXEEMoYGSULfsLRN20FWiv 0tgun2djUx8i16daF26KgtOdusiq+MAmVAtMO3hLoRIsQiCKf01vnG07+oYmCMUbALls8r nipuBDR6Uz5qAQTbGKapDR4iACOKkgU=
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-610-2D0RzB-OOOq7BnEva7IL0w-1; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 03:30:07 -0500
X-MC-Unique: 2D0RzB-OOOq7BnEva7IL0w-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53A073C1494C; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:30:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.43.135.229]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4394492BC6; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:30:06 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:30:05 +0100
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: martin.langer@ptb.de
Cc: ntp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <ZdRjDfGycqKcW6ib@localhost>
References: <OF3F043201.CF8CBB9A-ONC1258AAF.004C79AA-C1258AAF.004C79AB@ptb.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <OF3F043201.CF8CBB9A-ONC1258AAF.004C79AA-C1258AAF.004C79AB@ptb.de>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.9
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/Yp8xrn1Rp09oiS3lX7sVX6fIoKg>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] My current thoughts / NTS4PTP status
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:30:17 -0000

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 02:55:18PM +0100, martin.langer@ptb.de wrote:
>    @Miroslav: Thanks for adding the requested content.
>    I have one small comment: In chapter 2 (PTP transport for NTP)
>    it would be worth mentioning that the values (e.g. lengthField)
>    are in network byte order.

I updated the text to the following:

       The NTP TLV is an organization-specific TLV having the
       following fields (with octets in network order):

Let me know if you think that is not sufficient.

Thanks,

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email