Re: [ntpwg] The NTP WG has placed draft-haberman-ntpwg-mode-6-cmds in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 29 March 2017 12:16 UTC
Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48411296C6 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 05:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W_6NiweF27Ap for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 05:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (psp3.ntp.org [185.140.48.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08506129477 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 05:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psp3.ntp.org (localhost.ntp.org [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3C786DB51 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:16:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (fortinet.ntp.org [10.224.90.254]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E0186DAB3 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:16:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com ([206.197.161.140]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <brian@innovationslab.net>) id 1ctCWj-0005pa-Pp for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:16:47 +0000
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1809888141 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 05:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clemson.local (swifi-nat.jhuapl.edu [128.244.87.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D163280AE4 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 05:16:35 -0700 (PDT)
To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
References: <58DB51D3020000A10002562B@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de> <58DB51D3020000A10002562B@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de>
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <56ee9a97-6f65-bf71-0749-0596d3565a79@innovationslab.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 08:16:29 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <58DB51D3020000A10002562B@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 206.197.161.140
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: brian@innovationslab.net
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] The NTP WG has placed draft-haberman-ntpwg-mode-6-cmds in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1167124117859142573=="
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
Hi Ulrich, On 3/29/17 2:18 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Yesterday's message had the wrong address in it: > >> Yesterday I wrote: >>>> The NTP WG has placed draft-haberman-ntpwg-mode-6-cmds in state >>>> Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Karen O'Donoghue) >>>> >>>> The document is available at >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haberman-ntpwg-mode-6-cmds/ >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> Actually I miss the purpose of the draft: Currently it seems to be >>> just a copy from RFC 1305. Can anybody explain? When RFC 5905 was published, it did not contain the mode 6 commands. Several people have complained about that, especially having to refer back to a now obsolete RFC 1305. The purpose of this draft is to provide an up-to-date reference for the mode 6 commands. One of the items I want to complete if the draft is adopted is to modernize the text and align it with RFC 5905. Regards, Brian
_______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg
- [ntpwg] The NTP WG has placed draft-haberman-ntpw… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [ntpwg] The NTP WG has placed draft-haberman-… Brian Haberman
- [ntpwg] Antw: Re: The NTP WG has placed draft-hab… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [ntpwg] Antw: Re: The NTP WG has placed draft… Brian Haberman
- Re: [ntpwg] Antw: Re: The NTP WG has placed draft… Harlan Stenn