Re: [Ntp] virtual server for ntp server

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 26 March 2024 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D2FC14CE39 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0N3iQDrpk0GL for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FF1AC14F6A1 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.24/8.17.1.24) with ESMTP id 42QGJkUW016605; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:20:52 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h= from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to :content-type:mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=XW5m8xNcnISshPYdlJ zjR3UNJ2j34VZwTbIzTfMZum4=; b=n58fod4jTlE9kbTJuW1tS7TjUx1xrjgzu4 ITlB3l2E2P2xJuP/bMvj/wpp8NT7G8/k50hvdPWSQoLl1P2ixY9EIZc++UtxgzSg V2Ob3Ro/0fwK6osA8TNDRtO7Aph5lVfQf7IuxlPd0pwqaEAZwdbTq2+CJlNTjQoC 4k9io7HW39m4+AHlYsPOeEsBSShQaWULYgIKzcwjQRV/f2HAHUNSkuQYTfhHs2hw U71Gz3to17llijIUUEIkC7IjD1e/R+Lqw0++7fu8S1u1+lzAvuaZZ7/GLHDq6xGn 3r+rQbi8vEDZ6kWS1MyLWBAcHgjub4v8h7bCyAefNGf/7DqN8A8g==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (a72-247-45-31.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.31] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3x1q7d3by7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:20:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 42QGN86P026611; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 13:20:51 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.206]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3x2c01d8av-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 26 Mar 2024 13:20:50 -0400
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.203) by ustx2ex-dag4mb7.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.28; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:20:50 -0700
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) by ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) with mapi id 15.02.1258.028; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:20:50 -0700
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Renzo Marengo <buckroger2011@gmail.com>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ntp] virtual server for ntp server
Thread-Index: AQHaf6FzYmwL+zPWb0aT02NV0/A4wbFKdu0A
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:20:50 +0000
Message-ID: <9218C847-3E83-406C-A344-0AEF3BF8A336@akamai.com>
References: <CAMmfGZRc-VmnwYe4ijoCycdCpgRi1OZaiiYDehd4FMQQk3mQdQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMmfGZRc-VmnwYe4ijoCycdCpgRi1OZaiiYDehd4FMQQk3mQdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.81.24012814
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9218C8473E83406CA3440AEF3BF8A336akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-03-26_06,2024-03-21_02,2023-05-22_02
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=759 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2403210000 definitions=main-2403260124
X-Proofpoint-GUID: YElFNV-RoK48R1N82GRgKf9JLIQRFBSq
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: YElFNV-RoK48R1N82GRgKf9JLIQRFBSq
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-03-26_06,2024-03-21_02,2023-05-22_02
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=651 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2403210001 definitions=main-2403260124
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/9K2d7SZ94_G78VSONvRcHHvjwkk>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] virtual server for ntp server
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:20:59 -0000

I'm not able to find official document which suggests to not implement ntp server using virtual machine; I'd like to know reasons but specially what RFC shows this recommendation.

This is not mentioned in any RFC.