IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries-00.txt

Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> Tue, 03 August 2021 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mlichvar@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557943A24F7 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.452, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k8G2TdwmW-yE for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B93CD3A24F1 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1627999415; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mfkDEAB9y519dzI7ldn70tTUsTpfil2+OhtPddMN4WA=; b=TkrNRPRLtgPGeOUsfyKyAwVLopu2hFTwtDDF1H78A9BfzU5N1+HEtBm+XELL8+2gSSc9Lw dK7tmDSI14XXTak+WIbeJD67QwNWKtnZUkVTAxC5M13OOn2JUdqFKLiXkI8AVSm7DMu0aj Zm7VsEKZ14Z8eTvfnduIIHNKkX0MZOU=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-544-Rb7ySMRVO4uilQ1N1T94jg-1; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 10:03:33 -0400
X-MC-Unique: Rb7ySMRVO4uilQ1N1T94jg-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E456787D544; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 14:03:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (holly.tpb.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com [10.43.134.11]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4174E136F5; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 14:03:31 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 16:03:29 +0200
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <YQlMsSL1KuyTGe/q@localhost>
References: <162766035613.8327.13738714010782517143@ietfa.amsl.com> <B846ECE2-5C69-44E7-932E-E38A40CB04EA@akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B846ECE2-5C69-44E7-932E-E38A40CB04EA@akamai.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=mlichvar@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/A82JyFdeqV-thvLaccXtTyzZwr8>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 14:03:42 -0000

On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 04:19:18PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
> I think the 1023 stuff is reminiscent of "reserved ports" from BSD.  But I do not care very much, and if the WG agrees then I will remove that change. My reasons were that after a couple of years as one of the TLS experts, everything as "spec required" seems okay, we have a large number space, IETF review is a very high burden, and there's nothing special about those low numbers except vanity. :)

I don't have an opinion either way. Both is fine with me.

Overall, the document looks good to me. I just noticed few typos in
the acknowledgements. RedHat should be Red Hat, Harlen should be
Harlan. The popcorn seems out of place.

Thanks,

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email