Re: [Ntp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8877 (7012)

["MORTON JR., AL" <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Greg!
(this is a Reject).
Al

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2022 10:38 AM
> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; MORTON JR., AL <[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: [Ntp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8877 (7012)
> 
> Please note that the NTP epoch is Jan 1 1900.  The original text is correct.
> 
> 
> Greg Dowd  Microchip - Freq & Time Div.
> 
> Assoc. Technical Fellow - Engineering
> 3870 N First St, San Jose, CA 95134
> Direct: 408-964-7643
> [e-mail]
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ntp <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of RFC Errata System
> Sent: Monday, July 4, 2022 3:23 PM
> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: [Ntp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8877 (7012)
> 
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8877, "Guidelines for
> Defining Packet Timestamps".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-
> editor.org/errata/eid7012__;!!BhdT!jukU3aC-
> LO25x_iDFWb2hspXMANwTayZRkwAKICIQY2LOECRroRbULEwVTi8fHlHvF8UImcNdt5BDqg2Lg$
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 4.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    Wraparound:
>       This time format wraps around every 2^(32) seconds, which is
>       roughly 136 years.  The next wraparound will occur in the year
>       2036.
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    Wraparound:
>       This time format wraps around every 2^(32) seconds, which is
>       roughly 136 years.  The next wraparound will occur in the year
>       2106.
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> 1970+136=2106, not 2036
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use
> "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a
> decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and
> edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8877 (draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-09)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Guidelines for Defining Packet Timestamps
> Publication Date    : September 2020
> Author(s)           : T. Mizrahi, J. Fabini, A. Morton
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Network Time Protocols
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp__;!!BhdT
> !jukU3aC-
> LO25x_iDFWb2hspXMANwTayZRkwAKICIQY2LOECRroRbULEwVTi8fHlHvF8UImcNdt4G_ybaGw$