Re: [Ntp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8877 (7012)

Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Tue, 05 July 2022 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <wlosh@bsdimp.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEACC0D7C9C for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 07:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bsdimp-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zAA0tzAZZLQq for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 07:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B40DBC1850CA for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 07:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id u14so14880145ljh.2 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Jul 2022 07:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Jdihk4tdr2/PPVrcNkuC70tBnGob2PZu+R8pupVvGLo=; b=sEg3KmGHqD7CUthx44R7d0fgg/+92q49Fop4J+hyqpagqR3f0BYjZXnl+K3qCc0Exi aQ+TnOoA5KFMSNdikCsMXdgWdM1btre4dqkd0zoe5l18Qz0rDK5+56o0lYfbmRu8/kk0 mP/SwieYN6hWmux/wqssRappUjrqjnZQ9ZIUC0Feh3QaAQxtHTR35PhrH684QROBPyQ5 03946OqMpU8OJ+LDuYV1fSFq1rJSSLK7gt3m483ibegjbbe2slZWdEM9JcBI4Ijjqzak LoRF6I416b/D82IiLpig3xC3Miq7E6puV5cHJ58kVxoguExRRBrqmCqpt2h0uCeNcqHu dtbw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Jdihk4tdr2/PPVrcNkuC70tBnGob2PZu+R8pupVvGLo=; b=mmJF7ajGJPFw22H2p7S6IWIVO9aaJqlYWGLvt1qxvVus5jGStNyEt5/+ZAQCbx3ObE LaNFAS0TYB3leI2ibnCJ71YWbx4zW6aT0N2PdoKYuLHBnNulSv8mDM0QyipeKarRxwit ZX6x4/CnCWfjN/B83OlZ2zu5QF8RV+ckpG23oWZ3atbRWkyG4CyVJd4AiEf+Z5eimYhV +fghzeow4CFGWZP1jty1o/Hin5JH+vRC6HiFmD33s8VTfswUrzhWk3iuZSkQdmhxK9xI 6KaCb1kb7fWXJf6fk1wzq//P4k+GTsF7snL3aKpfyytvV2PR4i7Sicytlu29zwAikaK/ ak5g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/AlrkiVuX5Bx0cqBjviYglhkuQJVsWVBaJHCtICVqcKnwvpvGA Yn4DsCbNWSnpI04/J+rfhT45XQk4DBtMVRhcm2mrbA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tnVUCOZd7PsxbNZoQE+uuZYtEYp86A37ojajHQIjTuAxRUGUbqWcQO92yHsnJX2d8dYLKl7AiEx6rB/VCjUhI=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:bd89:0:b0:25a:86c8:93ca with SMTP id o9-20020a2ebd89000000b0025a86c893camr19244956ljq.419.1657033092893; Tue, 05 Jul 2022 07:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220704222306.9F27B289F1@rfcpa.amsl.com> <BYAPR11MB276025BDF8618F7E8CF1909FFC819@BYAPR11MB2760.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB276025BDF8618F7E8CF1909FFC819@BYAPR11MB2760.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:58:02 -0600
Message-ID: <CANCZdfqkOaKBh8y+V4rL1y_1sD6+sfA2ttd2WQOrtrwFEQAE=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg.Dowd=40microchip.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>, joachim.fabini@tuwien.ac.at, acmorton@att.com, ek.ietf@gmail.com, evyncke@cisco.com, Karen ODonoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, Dieter Sibold <dsibold.ietf@gmail.com>, nmalykh@ieee.org, NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e2246a05e310145c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/yklLMuoHkcrFSOhBs_I7Xxl6zo4>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8877 (7012)
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 14:58:25 -0000

For the relevant reference: RFC 5905, page 13, Section 6 data types:

   In the date and timestamp formats, the prime epoch, or base date of
   era 0, is 0 h 1 January 1900 UTC, when all bits are zero.


Warner


On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 8:38 AM <Greg.Dowd=40microchip.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
wrote:

> Please note that the NTP epoch is Jan 1 1900.  The original text is
> correct.
>
>
> Greg Dowd  Microchip - Freq & Time Div.
>
> Assoc. Technical Fellow - Engineering
> 3870 N First St, San Jose, CA 95134
> Direct: 408-964-7643
> Greg.Dowd@microchip.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ntp <ntp-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of RFC Errata System
> Sent: Monday, July 4, 2022 3:23 PM
> To: tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com; joachim.fabini@tuwien.ac.at;
> acmorton@att.com; ek.ietf@gmail.com; evyncke@cisco.com; odonoghue@isoc.org;
> dsibold.ietf@gmail.com
> Cc: nmalykh@ieee.org; ntp@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Subject: [Ntp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8877 (7012)
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8877, "Guidelines
> for Defining Packet Timestamps".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7012
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@ieee.org>
>
> Section: 4.2
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>    Wraparound:
>       This time format wraps around every 2^(32) seconds, which is
>       roughly 136 years.  The next wraparound will occur in the year
>       2036.
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    Wraparound:
>       This time format wraps around every 2^(32) seconds, which is
>       roughly 136 years.  The next wraparound will occur in the year
>       2106.
>
>
> Notes
> -----
> 1970+136=2106, not 2036
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use
> "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a
> decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status
> and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8877 (draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-09)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Guidelines for Defining Packet Timestamps
> Publication Date    : September 2020
> Author(s)           : T. Mizrahi, J. Fabini, A. Morton
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Network Time Protocols
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp
>
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp
>