Re: [Ntp] Google Roughtime Comments
Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Sat, 18 February 2023 00:23 UTC
Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207FBC140661 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:23:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HOeRtC2WCcOY for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:23:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22b.google.com (mail-oi1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4425C153CBF for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:23:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id i4so2717911oiy.4 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:23:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JG1HL40o2pkWGmFruBvjCXvQzUFOdlnupXjHdpVjt1A=; b=ZRXyb92NpNWMrMLq73DVZoqgLNhXwaJs9RqG/mGSfqdVZyEsRoAwhnfrLSHPJljKJx G607rCLSUzQm2y0dV6vVeb4lYO48z1SREj69zMcSJnWXSlJMg0t/NVgmJ6t0g71QsEil dQZ2xSVaxxrUki5H3PMX/IL40g7RPJeUL/P1Kq7oqFxoO1tWkj8eOSuGxZHnXldy/sHN SYDsSggtRHuNakw3aAjKb7Y//PB881auGKCiJM/tzBu3c2u67NVdZRYVgik8j0MBeuI8 pZlv+ORvHyRhyRDVOE+zAjneRBGUWtvMG1wXQF2ZQ48uCAx7f9oBUNJX1V+auk7WD2Vw H4hQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=JG1HL40o2pkWGmFruBvjCXvQzUFOdlnupXjHdpVjt1A=; b=Uh4nDX0JoAw5FnTukqNoMhzDhx4Ujf1W1+gSGg5808iD+tVfRWG5X1qcZXHazpmvEF jjDmwyCylCyeimfs1gf08xQGMNTOc4mU6wi4/01btsQNy6zuhPQqv39qC3O+6JpZ6L6T tbniznWKncuHZiflpTgW8f/v58uGE+GsEsZu3/FJfp1XZcaupgIvde7zNHZiz8KlKHTD ApiDX9uozLr26VKVaghh5fE2nK/WshfEyvhMRFlgPkOcLzoArlIp6eLFt7Dqqpy7z1O+ 1InlQ5soQWJcIUIKGnJ6yLaUGtXhEkLt+5c3xfVA7RKRR9RTzbQQcX7tXFILAf6vxOSa eSwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXXPLRGoK3KmWnsVumAXKdDQ7ng9twrzBderJ5AbEEeUOpqetu+ sVKcJdAEWM0WgYRFWjJTlyWJ0Z7ht3dPgNcUHS4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+9609SEUlRYGApfhXfIzRN/4+3wsGw1rLdLhLJaUBO0jFXorjXalbvPvrxWsd9pNVRxJCQfo2dNsrKe98nLLw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:158e:b0:37f:9a75:7846 with SMTP id t14-20020a056808158e00b0037f9a757846mr402052oiw.273.1676679801608; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:23:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABrd9SRr=Dka9y6mRdefOrt0mEm-j99=TKoRZ+rdKX=W1MKA-g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABrd9SRr=Dka9y6mRdefOrt0mEm-j99=TKoRZ+rdKX=W1MKA-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:23:10 -0800
Message-ID: <CACsn0cmkv0hAmz7Zo0bcpfSctmNXpGGLU-nC1HuBL5cvoCXjRA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Laurie <benl=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: ntp@ietf.org, Ceri Coghlan <cdriskill@google.com>, Hayden Blauzvern <hblauzvern@google.com>, Asra Ali <asraa@google.com>, Razieh Behjati <razieh@google.com>, Sarah de Haas <dehaass@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/HKgI1O8agkUbJPditUisBZACln4>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Google Roughtime Comments
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 00:23:23 -0000
I've created issues for all of these on our github repository. I think the alternate signatures algorithm comment likely needs a lot more discussion as does the non-certificate one. Both seem motivated by post-quantum, which makes me thing its worth doing, but having a variety of signature algorithms could make malfeasance reporting tricky as not all observers would support all signatures. We also need to consider how negotiation will work or if servers will have only one algorithm they support. This is likely to mean discussion by the WG. A new revision of the draft shall happen sometime, ideally before Yokohama. Sincerely, Watson -- Astra mortemque praestare gradatim
- [Ntp] Google Roughtime Comments Ben Laurie
- Re: [Ntp] Google Roughtime Comments Watson Ladd