[Ntp] In reference to NTP protocols 3 & 4 Quality of Service Protocol & the TCP & UDP & QUICC Protocols : https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis-00.txt
Duke Abbaddon <duke.abbaddon@gmail.com> Sat, 18 February 2023 05:58 UTC
Return-Path: <duke.abbaddon@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7896AC15DD44 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 21:58:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z7s9Ck-sjPI5 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 21:58:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x842.google.com (mail-qt1-x842.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::842]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F174C1595E5 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 21:58:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x842.google.com with SMTP id i12so88833qtx.2 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 21:58:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=InehrMcIlFMM9SUQeVDwKHCdhgWpbyRijahi/hMWRRw=; b=HSD0oluU/h+vrr3tcRS+9fnu2q89GQzW2c3w6ixt0sUmXlYcSrYWXl/cMrVWsm6NZ4 Er4bvmwI94SekN+qSjzcScmEed+U7I00WR38zluU8Y4B3kTg+AGgGdVaI+9VBVFjHGeY Evy2Qa8x4CWD+f9WcoOezOuPS8wCMlJKBCMSY2ldg4LP05IqBeQSB6+e/jnH/wuPlNi1 ztrFC36isdhbI5W3XV0wXwBU+HuX/WPTBpYf+ijq57bSpNioSV7UAEyPUGMgDyY9PcKu P9k4DR437TDnbwzERS4PoPteG3lf4jUdy36O9rO4S6W4rp1F7lEwtJ9oTLzllsTGa6ys FVdg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=InehrMcIlFMM9SUQeVDwKHCdhgWpbyRijahi/hMWRRw=; b=ILdNyCAjGS7JsCC8X3STP9nnjUfOauPPFg1VdmXRMD7i7/MhYJ4+PuFcDrBmuO7MNf NCAOvTzogCZhty0t6xALSqts5gAHT6fqgWuM/c4xfJGdX/bra9cukjRRve1VlgKns6pW ++z/z3PsahiRFjcdRlfNzbI/nCRKBXGOxCMMd3lOYqiDimaRuY/HrvFnlhbpBJjzddML t6j6m1o40k+Op22njcLSWRC9N+PT2tULmvlkaNWGJ+7u7aETk0A2B4zaeBrP8hAYtkeD O9f2lBY6RvY5azeqcb3g+PeigCiuMg9x2Ut6phPcaXP67Kz2ONKutDTGPro5mb7BdSxM ubVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXDbZpgYmA/6cf2D8T5MsJb3JgvYE5hh3uS/bZ/EdYQxAIjF/c4 UWhvA+qvzPuCj/Us4nEwzEtsMhjur6abs9K99i1NP3kUzfZ/umiG
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9s+c6ILDXS0pAPq8hmU70qeqPW2SMJUnZO6Aov0G3TUTcb4wVmTDj2xiE3u/j15zWUWtLJ3AUH2J0YXHSMnKA=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:42c9:0:b0:3b7:fda5:14b0 with SMTP id g9-20020ac842c9000000b003b7fda514b0mr426659qtm.2.1676699911113; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 21:58:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Duke Abbaddon <duke.abbaddon@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 05:58:31 +0000
Message-ID: <CAHpNFcM9P92MATWhMmB3zkXOvvFfaPwkspajwOEx7AE-juhFrA@mail.gmail.com>
To: ntp@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/eyJZY1ena3rVkA8Cl3OhmRx1Un0>
Subject: [Ntp] In reference to NTP protocols 3 & 4 Quality of Service Protocol & the TCP & UDP & QUICC Protocols : https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 05:58:36 -0000
Quality of Service Protocol & the TCP & UDP & QUICC Protocols : https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis-00.txt QOS : Quality Of Service protocol : RS https://is.gd/LEDSource Personally I believe QOS : Quality Of Service protocol be introduced to all network traffic, Primarily the Point A to point Z route needs planning first. QOS Datagram Network throughput Capacity of the network card Advertise Capacity in local network Plan routes based on network capacity So the Quality Of Service Protocol needs to send a datagram to the network adapter of site: A to Z A list of local routes needs to be cached & prioritised based on Network point A's network capacity & priority, The rout needs Point A to Z mapped & Z to A We then send data with a packet listing preferred routes [QOS][Origin : Target][Preferred route list forward sent][Network Performance Metric Packet] [Origin : Target][Preferred route list forward sent][Semi Static Route Tunnel] [Packet ID][Origin : Target][Data Packet] Searching for a route with every packet costs processor Cycles; So preferred routes need to be tunnelled & Secured with TLS Rupert S https://is.gd/CryptographicProves https://science.n-helix.com/2022/03/ice-ssrtp.html https://science.n-helix.com/2022/01/ntp.html Code Speed https://science.n-helix.com/2022/08/simd.html https://science.n-helix.com/2022/09/ovccans.html Chaos https://science.n-helix.com/2022/02/interrupt-entropy.html https://science.n-helix.com/2022/02/rdseed.html https://science.n-helix.com/2020/06/cryptoseed.html Example of a Secure Tunnel System: https://is.gd/SecurityHSM https://is.gd/WebPKI TLS Optimised https://drive.google.com/file/d/10XL19eGjxdCGj0tK8MULKlgWhHa9_5v9/view?usp=share_link Ethernet Security https://drive.google.com/file/d/18LNDcRSbqN7ubEzaO0pCsWaJHX68xCxf/view?usp=share_link ***** Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:39:25 +0100 Subject: New Version Notification for draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis-00.txt Hello, In order to facilitate the github based editorial process of a revised RFC5033 document that outlines the current best practises when it comes to designing new congestion control mechanisms, I want to invite everyone who has commented across various lists and in meetings, to raise issues and contribute text here: https://rscheff.github.io/rfc5033bis https://github.com/rscheff/rfc5033bis/issues As the home for this work has not yet fully formed yet, I created this as an individual draft. There are no text changes in rfc50333bis-00 compared to rfc5033, only minor editorial changes due to the use of markdown for the body of the document. A number of individuals have already expressed their interest in contributing improvements to this document. I am looking forward to those contributions - either as issues and discussion points, or as concrete text snippets - in order to reflect the current best understanding of the congestion control environment. A new version of I-D, draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Richard Scheffenegger and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis Revision: 00 Title: Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms Document date: 2023-02-17 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 11 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis/ Html: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis-00.html Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis Abstract: The IETF's standard congestion control schemes have been widely shown to be inadequate for various environments (e.g., high-speed networks). Recent research has yielded many alternate congestion control schemes that significantly differ from the IETF's congestion control principles. Using these new congestion control schemes in the global Internet has possible ramifications to both the traffic using the new congestion control and to traffic using the currently standardized congestion control. Therefore, the IETF must proceed with caution when dealing with alternate congestion control proposals. The goal of this document is to provide guidance for considering alternate congestion control algorithms within the IETF. The IETF Secretariat
- [Ntp] In reference to NTP protocols 3 & 4 Quality… Duke Abbaddon
- Re: [Ntp] In reference to NTP protocols 3 & 4 Qua… Danny Mayer