IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Mode 6 commands draft

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 15 August 2018 23:02 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E642130DEB for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 16:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l7405B0sox2W for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 16:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BC79130DD7 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 16:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w7FMwE6W028622; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 00:02:37 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=RUBUzzcJiSJdTrs1sXoMynB2DO8M4hRKx4PMnAVC/MU=; b=b9ISwmIE4dvWh2nSjRK2TwynMGVmetf6MI1ayT0L2tik0qhUborExm+2cb/ZcEzoxuEs JWpPZhDv1jjsLhGDmAka+1+jhQ+yn3mGFwtOelQe70RlzUKCljSmcNYCCvnuJLN1GhmI 2WhVbdl6WHTfTtrYnyF80Z7qAg9TOUjvOzP9WrFHSV+1PzcRk25rEz/KeHmhea60dvMq bkEBM3gJVFC+ZtLvixG1X+bpYqmmpez/HCa40mzUj0GHuRrElKa2zn0o/xFG2twPKWor 3jX0ZtU7XcRa7U0NYD/doW07HxfJV1kW2Farjbq9smr5YSgcsMeJ0KYyLMT2f/5TR4PC yQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint4 (a96-6-114-87.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [96.6.114.87] (may be forged)) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2kvg29efrb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Aug 2018 00:02:36 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id w7FMosMu023780; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:02:35 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.53]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2ksu4vwdqm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:02:34 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:02:33 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1365.000; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:02:33 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ntp] Mode 6 commands draft
Thread-Index: AQHUHqJsPIZeQrq9CE6PTtG5is5i/qTBe2QAgAAfbwA=
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 23:02:33 +0000
Message-ID: <E8A49863-9D90-404B-839B-17ECEF4080F6@akamai.com>
References: <df41b96a-d8a5-38b9-2f89-d2118495a798@innovationslab.net> <B28962FC-4AD6-43E7-999C-30A86BF378FF@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <B28962FC-4AD6-43E7-999C-30A86BF378FF@isoc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.0.180812
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.37.3]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <3B337232C76E1540B8628C54B1896DB9@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-08-15_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=812 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808150230
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-08-15_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=808 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808150232
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/JXRahsrklSYhjh7cIrhscjzAwhc>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Mode 6 commands draft
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 23:02:39 -0000

>    Additionally, no implementations beyond the reference implementation have identified themselves as having implemented Mode 6 commands. 
 
Is there another name we can use instead of "reference implementation"?   Harlan, any suggestions?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email