IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Mode 6 commands draft

Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> Wed, 15 August 2018 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <odonoghue@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2271E130DF3 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 14:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isoc.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y0Z226ojXGLL for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 14:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam04on062e.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe4d::62e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD2F5130E92 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 14:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isoc.org; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9X7FZ3bgX6+N4TermlW0QGfBAp2aYXlPoIiyiTjbc2Y=; b=EhjYjLhDstMPk+8WAtlVLmfVU/JobpR/r8GKoA6iQ0o8FeQyU1nrwBuYJDB7ym7FIMtU3pib8h11OQDo5u2rG0QdBmdFlie1T6Gjmz664k15G+bOhUxou1imUD5ReVfltXhQEo/8uGKKHTjdG2MTemgEMesH5EV/x/bZfyngW7Y=
Received: from DM2PR06MB909.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.178.27) by DM2PR06MB559.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.158.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1038.19; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 21:10:04 +0000
Received: from DM2PR06MB909.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7ca6:9b5e:c056:7693]) by DM2PR06MB909.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7ca6:9b5e:c056:7693%2]) with mapi id 15.20.1059.017; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 21:10:03 +0000
From: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
To: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ntp] Mode 6 commands draft
Thread-Index: AQHUHqJsPIZeQrq9CE6PTtG5is5i/qTBe2QA
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 21:10:03 +0000
Message-ID: <B28962FC-4AD6-43E7-999C-30A86BF378FF@isoc.org>
References: <df41b96a-d8a5-38b9-2f89-d2118495a798@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <df41b96a-d8a5-38b9-2f89-d2118495a798@innovationslab.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=odonoghue@isoc.org;
x-originating-ip: [65.216.180.152]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM2PR06MB559; 6:JKXvxqHOIaOxniLvrehOhrdZ5JMApOY39UzezuxKhWfyLbXdh5Oyd8ThOx/jms1s+AiQmWVUK99TaIVDXoVG6whmU1KiSuXCnQJNwegRNzVtTy/V0J7yeuKhLXyPkCzI2c5TJkXdNNu1326zNj+c0FfLsZ5b4EdzVtoCz/sw6QmfFM7m5kKWN5YcwB6iIA9qx0TCJjoCZWQvE1CjbYL4TwqIcNKIsbXgYtlin0tUscJWNSzJjEef2TqyI9jFwhass76fre/2TZMmro+sv6wJpiErsdTyXuuc456o1ShbBELQmMa9X6HPcEQ6XUXatR9zWRWaCAWe6dOdZf7U4bpLTPGgHgVt/qt2f3VFXWW7EDbE4Gn0Wzb+RddW0fVseDn4uP58CnIzdJUea+p6zXG7bXtSmO5fzPaUuA4eQMvJqB9O/ikSeO6uYWlJINeQyCqNTHJT1LS2+IU4wwgseBy2UA==; 5:K5o1h3daC3dnXQWCsPmVEJ+XlH8hZAxop8jy68Em8sNvnyHnqUz8WYKkdv+NPaGq0l5mFU6mGDWamroGNEwOO3ST0fYqP/WDidKRzMvMzGKSdZE3IDoes2QXGN62rKtClaJBAlWZgxmOzX8LUuskpndooT3t+zZZz4ZliXVac3E=; 7:ujYmbKt2t6fguo1Op+1CiD4+RhFxw4HwmlNkOtY//uycD5h22OXlZP2BLoMKKy03A8bk2CW7knx/Yglqj/2l6bxR/cj8qx7sUQtfZuhMDUgjWbXyuLczhfywEdeCu9LazAlgQDxakEfcjbdeN37jABw29z7U7jvfOlGJxjxITZcPxahl99H/ODAc9jMc5y7Rx0mppU6foXySHlTrZB8GfUtCh3A0kYjsS0/LkUnLWbzrgFVUvPJwSaEBmLzSni0X
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f3074488-800a-426c-3c0d-08d602f37864
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652040)(8989117)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990107)(5600074)(711020)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:DM2PR06MB559;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM2PR06MB559:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM2PR06MB5593B5BE89772CB87ACD565C23F0@DM2PR06MB559.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(100405760836317);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(3231311)(944501410)(52105095)(3002001)(10201501046)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(20161123564045)(20161123560045)(6072148)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:DM2PR06MB559; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR06MB559;
x-forefront-prvs: 07658B8EA3
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(136003)(39850400004)(396003)(346002)(376002)(366004)(199004)(189003)(99286004)(36756003)(76176011)(6506007)(6246003)(14454004)(6512007)(6306002)(25786009)(5640700003)(6436002)(81156014)(53936002)(229853002)(106356001)(2906002)(105586002)(8676002)(1730700003)(53546011)(5660300001)(2351001)(966005)(6486002)(102836004)(26005)(97736004)(81166006)(5250100002)(33656002)(68736007)(256004)(3846002)(2501003)(82746002)(478600001)(83716003)(316002)(86362001)(11346002)(8936002)(66066001)(305945005)(486006)(6916009)(476003)(6116002)(7736002)(2900100001)(186003)(2616005)(446003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR06MB559; H:DM2PR06MB909.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: isoc.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: /pb0m72PsLjihTZFbjFSS7NnfrJGofZErVQOWi+LYSUzAWfTAVCdZCE0qaZhr8UqAO+pZM4jlx+LF5mBOMg68A9VPgKJKypVdwqwoed8eHlaH7F0YBiO2xAOx6F/S3ihRwD9OoPnUhJMjR+OsNhOpyauAFwBgvkw6zxOE3D7hYjLFekTruIzJLHwshDZsFf/mI29vAUQRXu81ysypRV8UMBHf2kx7pz7MqUGug2HEAGGMCWXYUZDKVxuyix2Tn5A7JJEM5FNGnFmrygKoZjFK20OZEgDpY2JKZwhyo8F4AdPGj6slThmuZZvstkFqqqXF+R1E3LAEe9NuSqdlQCKVxPXNUxDXSc5301BUX6VEK4=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <BFA89C9943C12547BD4D1AF5A2FA57EA@namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f3074488-800a-426c-3c0d-08d602f37864
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Aug 2018 21:10:03.7925 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 89f84dfb-7285-4810-bc4d-8b9b5794554f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR06MB559
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/qTu3cF2gvUHiK2BxNgpuw7mJcos>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Mode 6 commands draft
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 21:10:09 -0000

Folks,

Dieter and I have reviewed the below referenced email thread. From this along with the IETF 102 discussions and the WGLC discussion, we have concluded that the working group consensus is as follows: 

Publish the document with a status of Informational. As a result, we will be submitting this document as is to the IESG shortly. 

Additionally, no implementations beyond the reference implementation have identified themselves as having implemented Mode 6 commands. 

Regards,
Karen

> On Jul 18, 2018, at 10:19 AM, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:
> 
> All,
>     In the NTP session two question arose on the mode 6 commands draft.
> 
>     The first question is about the appropriate status for this
> document. The draft is currently listed as Informational as the
> functionality is in current use by some implementations.
> 
>     Changing the status of the document to Historic would be an
> indication that the IETF believes the approach has either been
> superseded by another specification or is otherwise obsolete. The exact
> definition can be found at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2026#section-4.2.4
> 
>     Given the above, are there people who believe the status should be
> changed to Historic?
> 
> 
>     The second question relates to the genesis of NTP implementations
> that do not support the mode 6 commands. Are any of those
> implementations derived from the reference implementation of NTP?
> 
> Regards,
> Brian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email