Re: [Ntp] Shorter NTS packets?

James Browning <jamesb.fe80@gmail.com> Fri, 10 December 2021 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <jamesb.fe80@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2EF3A0332 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:01:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MqmLHTQRV_mk for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:01:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2739C3A0147 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:01:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com with SMTP id d10so22502473ybn.0 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:01:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=v49CY0XLapt/3VX2RIZQy2XVm0VnEwln7DnGIrlahTo=; b=IhkRXKUUz19knuzVLQCUBfjb/xrSMYKWzA3GQAHTBLreD3haRgsF/wx6DsrDFGRy/L WvCjbw3OinrpxKZ7Qwmr8NqqBFhsHWAH5tKzGcWP+7+3+jYRfVT8H4vZjDJC7zvCFUMe kI24/pP1XBWIqcTMUObzBDt4DVU02xkY0pmr0K37ZvIhWWwKQ0WNjQbBuWC34tbv887i i3WLb1rp2IBa6pPmG29hQodHkho5CXR6/wFdT6yMNTgJ9dSnEk/K7VEdin2C4JXqsL0M LF7iWAvD6nnJ4Ywitwmtv8cX+2YvqNTCo43kj9bLBTzi/XCjUvCGdHO7Zrae+BavaCMH tZ7Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=v49CY0XLapt/3VX2RIZQy2XVm0VnEwln7DnGIrlahTo=; b=Vjy4LNfLulNb3OZsTmlUxy+qJomyrxJ1ukT24UpxH3LIvuvb6cfwZlofYK7aD1LIvH ndXg3LyXbVk3zQNwuEKbaXsDDBvpo2MyA/KBSMDCzq0RBIXfBqDPjx8tDyrvs9S1zWOP omIAtZilsB/MYgE6xEcebAwfA3Q7WwBrhbEeXythBtGuiPN8bDUf0Bu0NMgz30ACgwK/ 2A4uSHMVdV9gy71KbUt+xvemlkYXBzjH8h78GcaY/NYhSIqxTL5YdHKa1Q9QPzy9lDf2 BVuymxx9T0pucq66cLaYUgg7XOWjxsQTPBaiiJsf6RUX9NCWdiDWsyw8uCTqpI5XUWNi 4Xhg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mrB+dGd3RpJTE0CnDfyc9e0w7vCw1pfAgsLTiEBbWHjilsu+p 3UDJMfZozTA8QAegX6p/bdbFMRdvQGHcg/ckTW6K6ZU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyVTQKH7MlKE8UscRJS0TPMAd6FIGGwgN6mcGy4LKPfN/b6V6QKWJSfKzq0BbanPzu32dLdIJYzjBkBHfdp/I=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:db8e:: with SMTP id g136mr14706438ybf.301.1639152095641; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:01:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <mlichvar@redhat.com> <YbHR69xnXYUR3NY3@localhost> <20211209215746.5385B28C1BF@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net>
In-Reply-To: <20211209215746.5385B28C1BF@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net>
From: James Browning <jamesb.fe80@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:00:00 -0800
Message-ID: <CAFTY+dCs47zaXfWUU5BT1kQ_YDRscbcEA0RwXNMSLUGUihu5tg@mail.gmail.com>
To: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000064c5c305d2ccd69f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/MB2BqL5ifIsBcwW2nQZNxSZVFzc>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Shorter NTS packets?
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 16:01:42 -0000

On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 1:57 PM Hal Murray <halmurray@sonic.net> wrote:

> How much of the problem will shorter packets solve?
>
> NTS-KE includes a port number.  Can each server just pick
> a local port?
>

I would jokingly suggest udp port 4460, at least until the PHBs have it
hard blocked.

>