Re: [Ntp] FW: Expiration impending: <draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries-03.txt>

Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> Mon, 18 April 2022 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <krose@krose.org>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85CA3A10B4 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 07:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=krose.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0spvAA3VpmVT for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 07:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFA173A10B2 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 07:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id e21so18756060wrc.8 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 07:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krose.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=swOUmJ6IR8QY/dQj7aZNdkYx2TQTioqLCpu1Co614cE=; b=QA7pKkf/Fp20DDgaFdmAFPgdHu0HYh4a4rrAHeCxM9z2bYdzAgTouItH8iDN/Au7Tm rmDu9d/Kt78CETD1Mcp9os6gKsEsz+nlMfO+UnDKGt6EPbpeEsmgDVCs3+N5poYrN4R4 OSLoupuSjrobi1OuAzTMMWPaa5lVVtPmxXKDM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=swOUmJ6IR8QY/dQj7aZNdkYx2TQTioqLCpu1Co614cE=; b=H1vNkxokG9vIK7zNSjM13LSkQvqMp0UkpdJdtpSggdGDdBmWEy6MF6FCUz9OXVpTN4 eAasyyB3FOOsMPnBEZkWgRxUxjnr8izqnU3BWTUQUXkpbkU+uc4SbgdRXnWKG2tNYKXt iOvZBB6Z28hJXb1YyhRE5jnc1MooFD2poJ/Z084VYyr8h7OsPq78PegNeuJaZIHdkPGw Gj0+1m7rV4YXH45n/DXp1/1ZFaew6KhMd37NKgNoLsIbC2Xem6S14d4tH5flC8rG9xAG vVQgzyt9tZsxy9q36iO0A1zXkf3uBJN83GlpvEth2aNCQerHWeMfrGB5Uj/ELdP3jr7v c0AQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533f3rAFhRatXgQgRXo3NSmyEVEqGryrfbw+1e5cVy4PiL8buKEL oeiKrNfHx8ZgMQOrgumbjcPPa8VhUQcO7kFSdJ1ssw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz0TW/dkD0hw7oFsnH1kunhH1ipNOg75PhackfPLOefj0Mi8vgQyCfkH+vFe9/bhUnhAAaOuOzlqrCVrj4UkRo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:18cb:b0:207:8c65:3fd4 with SMTP id w11-20020a05600018cb00b002078c653fd4mr8498016wrq.131.1650292263330; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 07:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <165017898651.15982.2319496103629609266@ietfa.amsl.com> <56C72FA6-91FC-47FF-BEFF-1501CDEB7C2A@akamai.com> <CAJU8_nUY4hHMTazbNWw7exBfFnK+AJ-Ri5qd6iC3vgLHJnXo4A@mail.gmail.com> <CAJm83bCaFLeAC4OGFqS85kTA0LQNyBLvPqCWmVVNe-8NmvtJag@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJm83bCaFLeAC4OGFqS85kTA0LQNyBLvPqCWmVVNe-8NmvtJag@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:30:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJU8_nUf4U+jrUpg5r240juJWzE1soTiiyRX-SN94WM7ZrKz_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000021b86705dcee9c3c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/OLMD-twSiYXNUQC1M2b14GRdoyg>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] FW: Expiration impending: <draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries-03.txt>
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 14:31:12 -0000

On Mon, Apr 18, 2022, 10:28 AM Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 10:03 AM Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> wrote:
>
> > * Why isn't most of this document instead a series of errata against the
> original documents, where inconsistencies exist?
>
> Errata should be reserved for cases where the document fails to
> reflect the authors' intent, not for cases where the intent was
> regrettable. I can see the argument that the swapped autokey nibbles
> fall into the former category, but I would argue not: Section 13 of
> RFC 5906 accurately describes what IANA did (rather than what we wish
> they'd done / wish we'd told them to do). So I don't see anything in
> this document where an erratum seems more appropriate.
>

Makes sense. Thanks.

Kyle

>