[Ntp] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-ntp-03-01: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 26 November 2021 13:35 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: ntp-chairs@ietf.org, ntp@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <163793370180.32288.10979297986678279537@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 05:35:02 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/sF3OMROs3JsVP_tun_lxb90ezGs>
Subject: [Ntp] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-ntp-03-01: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-ntp-03-01: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-ntp/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This looks good to me except for the following minor comments:
- unsure whether the plural form 'protocols' should be used in the charter as
the WG name is singular :-) - this may well have been discussed already but
will it be possible to collaborate with IEEE on IEEE 1588 ? (e.g., are the IEEE
documents openly and freely available ?) - should the WG items also include one
item about NTPv4 maintenance ?

All minor points, so good to go!

-éric

[Ntp] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
Re: [Ntp] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-i… Erik Kline
Re: [Ntp] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-i… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)