Re: [nvo3] Network Overlays in Taipei
Benson Schliesser <bschlies@cisco.com> Fri, 14 October 2011 01:19 UTC
Return-Path: <bschlies@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0571021F8BB1; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ObbtMFd0C03O; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5822021F8AC9; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=bschlies@cisco.com; l=475; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1318555144; x=1319764744; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+SCOUzPfpwILZPCOTuyl/iV/rNtvoOGtMYBuvzyXUY4=; b=YUsVUTM2GaJ/w76jb9nK5tSUewsD5BZpXlMqRVeDIEXaq0lelcfxc7hf DBeTEpGIdt0622Bj1o+AepiuDTxIUhKLZqpaDgI/DznvjTDQeGGDirubZ oQzVr9QGblufm5Ylv/wrwNrGsu9pW6VaagX164+V2JmxkMI9oucHqwM8V Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAKaNl06tJV2c/2dsb2JhbABDqFuBBYFTAQEBAwESASc/EAtGVwYBNIdcmRABnieHDGEEk3iRcQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,343,1315180800"; d="scan'208";a="28336520"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2011 01:19:03 +0000
Received: from dhcp-222-99.meetings.nanog.org (bxb-vpn3-356.cisco.com [10.86.249.100]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9E1J2VN010324; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:19:02 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Benson Schliesser <bschlies@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <201110132352.p9DNq0Tm013078@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:19:01 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2D6F2B3F-5008-4282-AFA8-F01697B3FFCB@cisco.com>
References: <201110131436.p9DEa2Ej006983@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <201110132108.p9DL8Ukl010058@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E058CFE62B2@MX14A.corp.emc.com> <201110132352.p9DNq0Tm013078@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, david.black@emc.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org, nvo3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Network Overlays in Taipei
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "L2 \"Network Virtualization Over l3\" overlay discussion list \(nvo3\)" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:19:05 -0000
FYI - I've already asked the secretariat to help resolve the ARMD/L2VPN conflict. I'll post follow-up details when this is sorted. Cheers, -Benson On Oct 13, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Thomas Narten wrote: >> For the current schedule, Monday 1p is the same slot as armd, which >> has a significant overlap of interest with nvo3, so Thursday, 9a >> would probably be a better choice. > > Indeed, that is a problem. Thanks for pointing it out. > > Thomas
- [nvo3] Network Overlays in Taipai Thomas Narten
- Re: [nvo3] Network Overlays in Taipai Thomas Narten
- Re: [nvo3] Network Overlays in Taipei david.black
- Re: [nvo3] Network Overlays in Taipei Thomas Narten
- Re: [nvo3] Network Overlays in Taipei Benson Schliesser