IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nvo3] Network Overlays in Taipei

Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Thu, 13 October 2011 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B17121F8AAC; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rFvh4WjbJrPh; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com (e38.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA4321F8AA9; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e38.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p9DNhiuQ003954; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:43:44 -0600
Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p9DNq4hg066350; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:52:04 -0600
Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p9DNq3cB003368; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:52:03 -0600
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (sig-9-65-226-110.mts.ibm.com [9.65.226.110]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id p9DNq1Vj003294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:52:02 -0600
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.12.5) with ESMTP id p9DNq0Tm013078; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:52:01 -0400
Message-Id: <201110132352.p9DNq0Tm013078@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: david.black@emc.com
In-reply-to: <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E058CFE62B2@MX14A.corp.emc.com>
References: <201110131436.p9DEa2Ej006983@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <201110132108.p9DL8Ukl010058@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E058CFE62B2@MX14A.corp.emc.com>
Comments: In-reply-to <david.black@emc.com> message dated "Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:47:12 -0400."
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:52:00 -0400
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org, nvo3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Network Overlays in Taipei
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "L2 \"Network Virtualization Over l3\" overlay discussion list \(nvo3\)" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:52:10 -0000

> For the current schedule, Monday 1p is the same slot as armd, which
> has a significant overlap of interest with nvo3, so Thursday, 9a
> would probably be a better choice.

Indeed, that is a problem. Thanks for pointing it out. 

Thomas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email