[nvo3] Comments on draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-01

[Lucy yong <[e-mail]>]

First of all, I support the draft to be published as RFC. It addresses a useful application.

Here are some comments for the improvement.

General:

-          NVO3 may have multi-homing NVE configuration, please address that each mcast method is able to support multi-homing NVEs.

-          It is necessary to elaborate security concerns  in section 7 when using mcast methods in nvo3 environment

-          Several citations refer to old drafts, should point to the corresponding RFCs.

-          Terms: Tenant system, TSS, hosts, VM, are used in the draft here and there, suggest making consistent or state out at beginning that they mean the same entity.

In Section 3.2, the following text  is unclear:


 ….When the members of a multicast group are outside the NVO3
   domain, it is necessary for NVO3 gateways to keep track of the
   remote members of each multicast group.  The NVEs then communicate
   these mappings to the NVA.  Even if the membership is not
   communicated to the NVA, if it is necessary to prevent hosts
   attached to an NVE that have not subscribed to a multicast group
   from receiving the multicast traffic, the NVE needs to maintain the
   multicast group membership.

Suggested text as follow:

   …When the members of a multicast group are outside the NVO3
   domain, it is necessary for NVO3 gateways to keep track of the
   remote members of each multicast group.  The NVEs and gateways communicate
   the interested multicast groups to the NVA. To prevent hosts attached to an NVE that have not
   subscribed to a multicast group from receiving the multicast traffic, the NVE needs to maintain the
   multicast group membership.

In section 3.4, need a reference to BIER solution.

Section 5.1 case may happen to all mcast methods, not only to the method in 3.3, clarify which mcast solution still can work and which will not. In addition, clarify what are TSS router and TS’s router.


Cheers,
Lucy




From: nvo3 [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 6:16 AM
To: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB); NVO3
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [nvo3] WG last call for draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-01

WG

I am going to let this last call run for a couple more weeks as I have not seen any comments.

The new closing date is Friday 5th Feb 2016.

Regards

Matthew

From: Dacheng Zhang <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> on behalf of Matthew Bocci <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Date: Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 10:40
To: NVO3 <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: "[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: [nvo3] WG last call for draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-01

This email begins a two week working group last call for draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-01.txt.

Please review the draft and post any comments to the NVO3 working group list.

If you have read the latest version of the draft but have no comments and believe it is ready for publication as an Informational RFC, please also indicate so to the WG email list.

This working group last call will close on Friday 21st January 2016.

Best regards

Matthew and Benson