IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nvo3] [Int-area] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-nvo3-gue-03.txt

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Mon, 20 June 2016 03:14 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF9412D8EB; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 20:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DQhohZEtTzLI; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 20:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A88EF12D8E4; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 20:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.71.3.51] (24-158-28-60.static.dlth.mn.charter.com [24.158.28.60]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u5K3Dl21008991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 19 Jun 2016 20:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
To: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
References: <20160610171451.30437.44413.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALx6S34_ba2kBhUY7keEMmPO3fTRAAQsCkyGiy47=NnPm8xgug@mail.gmail.com> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0D5647FB@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CALx6S37K2H+SuEN+5Nmi-GOX0nX-k34YQt0anWJWTUBpBZZGew@mail.gmail.com> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0D564ABD@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0D564B19@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <57637C4B.3040603@isi.edu> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0D564BD3@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <5763A13F.9090009@isi.edu> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0D564C44@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <57641A16.7000902@isi.edu> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0D56516D@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <57675F6A.2060802@isi.edu>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 20:13:46 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0D56516D@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nvo3/ALQ52WIFN8YQrEfkJbLFnwGuxC4>
Cc: "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] [Int-area] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-nvo3-gue-03.txt
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Network Virtualization Overlays \(NVO3\) Working Group" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nvo3/>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 03:14:16 -0000


On 6/19/2016 7:47 PM, Xuxiaohu wrote:
> Sure. That's why we usually need to determine a WG which is more suitable for a given draft firstly in the IETF. If you firmly believe the more suitable WG for draft-ietf-nvo3-gue is NVO3, rather than INTAREA and TSVWG, please give your rationale

My rationale is simple - it's sufficient and that's where it already is
a WG doc.

If that were not the case, you'd have a stronger argument.

But I really don't care all that much. If the chairs want to shift WGs,
then they can make the case for a call for adoption elsewhere.

However, given the substantial review this doc has already received both
here and from TSV reviewers, I think that's largely wasted effort.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email