Re: [nvo3] [Int-area] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-nvo3-gue-03.txt

Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com> Fri, 17 June 2016 06:41 UTC

Return-Path: <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5EF12D093; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 23:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z5GKqJMvcgcp; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 23:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B750F12B011; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 23:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CQY62474; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 06:41:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.70) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:41:28 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:41:21 +0800
From: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Thread-Topic: [nvo3] [Int-area] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-nvo3-gue-03.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRx9yFbJRXFm15w0+03CGCJqjQoZ/s3uCQ//+pDoCAAKVlYA==
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 06:41:22 +0000
Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0D564BAF@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <20160610171451.30437.44413.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALx6S34_ba2kBhUY7keEMmPO3fTRAAQsCkyGiy47=NnPm8xgug@mail.gmail.com> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0D5647FB@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CALx6S37K2H+SuEN+5Nmi-GOX0nX-k34YQt0anWJWTUBpBZZGew@mail.gmail.com> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0D564ABD@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <57637961.3020206@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <57637961.3020206@isi.edu>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.99.55]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090206.57639B99.0079, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 738edd86f1cc59daf0dfa3ff8c2bcb52
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nvo3/lO8Uw2dUcCB_kUm0OCB7Lm9C-S0>
Cc: "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] [Int-area] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-nvo3-gue-03.txt
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Network Virtualization Overlays \(NVO3\) Working Group" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nvo3/>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 06:41:34 -0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Touch [mailto:touch@isi.edu]
> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 12:15 PM
> To: Xuxiaohu; Tom Herbert
> Cc: nvo3@ietf.org; int-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [nvo3] [Int-area] Fwd: New Version Notification for
> draft-ietf-nvo3-gue-03.txt
> 
> 
> 
> On 6/16/2016 6:48 PM, Xuxiaohu wrote:
> > Tom,
> >
> > What's the real benefit of such implementation of IP-in-UDP compared
> > to the
> >> approach as described draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03? Save one UDP
> >> port number?
> >> Yes, saves a port number.
> 
> More than that, GUE was accepted as a WG doc *and* has already been
> assigned a port number.

Oh, a WG doc? a doc which has nothing to do with multi-tenancy but happens to be adopted by a WG working on multi-tenancy?

> > To save a port number, the header format is made ugly. Is it worthwhile? If
> UDP port resource was so sparse as you had imagined, I think the UDP port
> resource keeper would not allocate two different port numbers for VXLAN and
> VXLAN-GPE since the P-bit in VXLAN-GPE header is enough to distinguish
> VXLAN-GPE from VXLAN. For more details, please look at section 3.2 of
> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-02#page-6).
> VXLAN was assigned in 2011.
> 
> VXLAN-GPE was assigned this year (2016).
> 
> If what you say is correct*, then you might be correct in assuming that a
> VXLAN-GPE assignment might inhibit a later VXLAN assignment, but that's not
> the order things happened.

Your logic seems confused to me. My point is VXLAN-GPE should share the same port number (i.e., 4789) with VXLAN if the port number resource was so sparse. Unless that assumption is fake.

*******************http://www.honeypots.net/misc/services*********************
vxlan              4789        udp    Virtual eXtensible Local     [Lawrence_Kreeger]                                    [Lawrence_Kreeger]                                        2013-04-19   2014-06-17   [RFC 7348]
                                      Area Network (VXLAN)
                   4789        tcp    Reserved
                                      Generic Protocol Extension
vxlan-gpe          4790        udp    for Virtual eXtensible Local [Lawrence_Kreeger]                                    [Lawrence_Kreeger]                                        2014-08-26
                                      Area Network (VXLAN)
                   4790        tcp    Reserved
************************************************************************

> *(I haven't looked and don't plan to, because the point is irrelevant even if
> assumed)
> 
> Joe