Re: [nvo3] draft-drake-nvo3-evpn-control-plane

"NAPIERALA, MARIA H" <mn1921@att.com> Fri, 28 September 2012 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mn1921@att.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FCC21F8604 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.206
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.206 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.393, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X6ExsIhkYs+M for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo08.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo08.seg.att.com [209.65.160.95]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D36721F85F0 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.128.153] (EHLO nbfkord-smmo08.seg.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo08.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.11.0-12) with ESMTP id e3306605.5534b940.27458.00-582.77606.nbfkord-smmo08.seg.att.com (envelope-from <mn1921@att.com>); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:06:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 5066033e4c2d1084-a16abd9caff75f6ffb7e221d1243b708043ebc34
Received: from unknown [144.160.128.153] (EHLO flpi408.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com) by nbfkord-smmo08.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.11.0-12) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 53306605.0.27423.00-457.77516.nbfkord-smmo08.seg.att.com (envelope-from <mn1921@att.com>); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:06:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 50660336598bac74-fa72b16e4a47339f9ab98f86bc47a86bb45bf4e9
Received: from enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by flpi408.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8SK6CNw000354; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:06:13 -0700
Received: from fflint03.pst.cso.att.com (fflint03.pst.cso.att.com [150.234.39.63]) by flpi408.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8SK5sPg031800 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:06:04 -0700
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUB9A.ITServices.sbc.com (misout7msghub9a.itservices.sbc.com [144.151.223.62]) by fflint03.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:05:28 -0700
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSR9I.ITServices.sbc.com ([144.151.223.56]) by MISOUT7MSGHUB9A.ITServices.sbc.com ([144.151.223.62]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:05:27 -0400
From: "NAPIERALA, MARIA H" <mn1921@att.com>
To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>, "Luyuan Fang (lufang)" <lufang@cisco.com>, "Bitar, Nabil N" <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>, "Fedyk, Donald (Don)" <donald.fedyk@alcatel-lucent.com>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [nvo3] draft-drake-nvo3-evpn-control-plane
Thread-Index: AQHNlO0QRq+vpeKxXk6HHp4doZWi65eZkmBQgABNXgD//9rDgIAAV2sA//+9bsCAAFrWgIAACRWAgAAUPgCAAAM2AIAACQOAgAQUQACAAK9rgIAAbWyAgACE/zCAAHD2AP//vvKw
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:05:26 +0000
Message-ID: <1D70D757A2C9D54D83B4CBD7625FA80EBB4B98@MISOUT7MSGUSR9I.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <0DB8F45437AB844CBB5102F807A0AD930F4F7863@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> <CC871008.56E89%nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com> <0DB8F45437AB844CBB5102F807A0AD930F4FA64A@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> <14C7F4F06DB5814AB0DE29716C4F6D6702E1BB2135@FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <1D70D757A2C9D54D83B4CBD7625FA80EBB48C0@MISOUT7MSGUSR9I.ITServices.sbc.com> <0182DEA5604B3A44A2EE61F3EE3ED69E02E388@BL2PRD0510MB349.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <0182DEA5604B3A44A2EE61F3EE3ED69E02E388@BL2PRD0510MB349.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.91.76.238]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_1D70D757A2C9D54D83B4CBD7625FA80EBB4B98MISOUT7MSGUSR9IIT_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <mn1921@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.128.153]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=WbC7nTdX c=1 sm=0 a=xwOvzTHDVLE4u4nGvK72ag==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=rF0NNat--VkA:10 a=MifnA0j2sn4A:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=BLc]
X-AnalysisOut: [eEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32RAAAA:8 a=ylZzsNE9E]
X-AnalysisOut: [z0A:10 a=OUXY8nFuAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=wmEe0fuVOfY_gfb]
X-AnalysisOut: [1sKAA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=peF9eE_zjQwA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA]
X-AnalysisOut: [:10 a=wRvhHyV5TONdL8DX:21 a=k5gqqYIHMGfzUqNF:21 a=Bce6dw_O]
X-AnalysisOut: [8JHESxwKmi8A:9 a=Kv3IOO_kmutvQ6Bu:21 a=9X48Li0GJuTrT3UQ:21]
Subject: Re: [nvo3] draft-drake-nvo3-evpn-control-plane
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Network Virtualization Overlays \(NVO3\) Working Group" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:06:24 -0000

Let me refer you the following e-mail (attached) in case you missed it.

Maria


> -----Original Message-----
> From: John E Drake [mailto:jdrake@juniper.net]
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:38 PM
> To: NAPIERALA, MARIA H; Henderickx, Wim (Wim); Luyuan Fang (lufang);
> Bitar, Nabil N; Fedyk, Donald (Don); nvo3@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [nvo3] draft-drake-nvo3-evpn-control-plane
> 
> Comment inline.
> 
> Yours irrespectively,
> 
> John
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nvo3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:nvo3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of
> > NAPIERALA, MARIA H
> > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 9:54 AM
> > To: Henderickx, Wim (Wim); Luyuan Fang (lufang); Bitar, Nabil N;
> Fedyk,
> > Donald (Don); nvo3@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [nvo3] draft-drake-nvo3-evpn-control-plane
> >
> > Since layer 3 can address both intra-subnet and inter-subnet IP
> > communication by a uniform forwarding (i.e., there is no difference
> in
> > forwarding between those two), the question is why to introduce a
> > complication of mixing L2 and L3 forwarding in the *same* solution.
> 
> JD:  Maria, did you invent some new technology that you're not telling
> anyone about?
> 

--- Begin Message ---
Don,

> Hi Maria
> 
> Perhaps I'm missing something but I thought EVPN was built using many of the 
> same building blocks as RFC4364 so that it could be used in combination 
> with EVPN.  In other words IP VPN + EVPN.  

Moreover, section 6.1 of draft-raggarwa-data-center-mobility-03.txt
describes how EVPN can cover inter-VLAN traffic (by forming
EVPN extranets).

Yakov.

> 
> Does that not address your point?
> 
> Thanks,
> Don
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nvo3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:nvo3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of NAPIE
RALA, MARIA H
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 10:09 AM
> To: nvo3@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [nvo3] draft-drake-nvo3-evpn-control-plane
> 
> I think we should try to clarify what problems or what type of data centers s
pecific solutions are addressing.
> Specifically, EVPN can only address traffic bridged in the same VLAN. In data
 centers where most traffic is inter-VLAN, i.e., packets are routed, the EVPN d
oesn't achieve much as an overall solution.
> I tried to make this point on the webex during the nvo3 interim session when 
draft-drake-nvo3-evpn-control-plane was discussed but I am not sure if my messa
ge went through.
> 
> Maria
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nvo3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:nvo3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> > Thomas Nadeau
> > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 11:55 AM
> > To: nvo3@ietf.org
> > Subject: [nvo3] draft-drake-nvo3-evpn-control-plane
> > 
> > 
> > 	A number of us just published this draft and wanted to bring it
> > to the NVO3 WG's attention.  We will be presenting/discussing this
> > draft at the interim meeting this week as well, but please discuss here
> > on the list as well.
> > 
> > 	Thanks,
> > 
> > 	Tom, John, et al
> > 
> > 
> > A new version of I-D, draft-drake-nvo3-evpn-control-plane-00.txt
> > has been successfully submitted by Thomas D. Nadeau and posted to the
> > IETF repository.
> > 
> > Filename:	 draft-drake-nvo3-evpn-control-plane
> > Revision:	 00
> > Title:		 A Control Plane for Network Virtualized Overlays
> > Creation date:	 2012-09-16
> > WG ID:		 Individual Submission
> > Number of pages: 12
> > URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-drake-nvo3-
> > evpn-control-plane-00.txt
> > Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-drake-nvo3-evpn-
> > control-plane
> > Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-drake-nvo3-evpn-
> > control-plane-00
> > 
> > 
> > Abstract:
> >        The purpose of this document is to describe how Ethernet Virtual
> >        Private Network (E-VPN) can be used as the control plane for
> >        Network Virtual Overlays.  Currently this protocol is defined to
> >        act as the control plane for Virtual Extensible Local Area
> >        Network (VXLAN), Network Virtualization using Generic Routing
> >        Encapsulation (NVGRE), MPLS or VLANs while maintaining their
> >        existing data plane encapsulations. The intent is that this
> >        protocol will be capable of extensions in the future to handle
> >        additinal data plane encapsulations and functions as needed.
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > nvo3 mailing list
> > nvo3@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> nvo3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> nvo3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
--- End Message ---