[nvo3] L2VPN overlap?
Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Tue, 04 October 2011 01:57 UTC
Return-Path: <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C2A21F8B70 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 18:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.099, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3fXHd0KvyITz for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 18:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com (e8.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.138]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA17B21F8B6C for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 18:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (d01relay07.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.147]) by e8.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p93Nn3xj002416 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:49:03 -0400
Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p9404Af53137608 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 20:04:10 -0400
Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p94049JS000477 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 21:04:09 -0300
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (sig-9-65-206-44.mts.ibm.com [9.65.206.44]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id p94049Eb000457 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 21:04:09 -0300
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.12.5) with ESMTP id p94048u7009531 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 20:04:08 -0400
Message-Id: <201110040004.p94048u7009531@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: nvo3@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:04:08 -0400
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [nvo3] L2VPN overlap?
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "L2 \"Network Virtualization Over l3\" overlay discussion list \(nvo3\)" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 01:57:53 -0000
FYI, a discussion of sorts started on the L2VPN list as to whether L2 overlays as proposed for this list are already in-scope for the L2VPN WG. I.e., see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/current/msg02874.html Thomas
- [nvo3] L2VPN overlap? Thomas Narten
- Re: [nvo3] L2VPN overlap? Murari Sridharan
- [nvo3] possible scope gap//re: L2VPN overlap? Xuxiaohu
- Re: [nvo3] possible scope gap//re: L2VPN overlap? Xuxiaohu